тхеодоре кацзынски
Well-Known Member
I suppose I am working on the assumption that "I didn't do it" isn't enough to acquit a person.
So I was wondering if a) there's a legal issue where if it's he said/she said then no conviction is allowed in Ireland or b) there's more to the story that isn't in that Irish Times piece.
Mainly because I find it so literally unbelievable otherwise that I'm looking for a reason that makes sense here.
It's not that he said/she said disqualifies the case, rather that the case must be proven beyond reasonable doubt. With rape it usually comes down to one persons word v anothers and if the jury doesn't find the case beyond reasonable doubt then they must acquit.
A civil case may be taken wherein the accused can be found guilty on the balance of probabilities, this a lower burden of proof. As far as I know a civil case will not result in a jail term but instead compensation to be paid or an injunction taken out against the guilty party.
I don't find it unbelievable at all given the results of many many rape cases here. Like how many men have walked away with no record or custodial sentence even after being found guilty.
If found guilty they will have a record, even if no sentence is imposed.