sleepy
Well-Known Member
skychems?
They're the worst kind
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
skychems?
your kids are sick cos you didn't vaccinate them
The Australians are clamping down on this sort of nonsense. No vaccination? No welfare.
Bit racist, isn't it?
Australia? Yeah, just a bit.
Well, that and legislating as if only poor people are bonkers
Not as disproportionately affected as they would be by the clinical needs and financial burden of a child brain damaged by a disease they can easily prevent if they didn't have their head in the sand. I don't think this is necessarily the right way to go about enforcing vaccination but given the weight of evidence supporting vaccination, lack of evidence supporting the fears underlying most anti-vaccine stances and, for me, the moral responsibility towards protecting not only your child but those around them should be something that carries more weight than it does.Reading it again it seems that the benefits lost are universal ones but yeah, your point still stands, the less well off will be disproportionately affected.
Nah, raw food types are generally scientifically minded I find. Their reasoning is sound and I sorta wish I could be motivated enough to rid my diet of shite. Its definitely gotta be a lower to lower middle class demographic. Anyone with a reasonable level of education and some means can't possibly buy into sensational garb. Oh wait..... Big hole in my thinking... I'll shut my mouthwhat is the main demographic of anti-vaxxers anyway? i would've assumed it was fairly affluent middle-class raw food types but i don't have any supporting evidence
quick look at the members of this group bolsters that assumption
Log into Facebook | Facebook
that and random stoopids
what is the main demographic of anti-vaxxers anyway? i would've assumed it was fairly affluent middle-class raw food types but i don't have any supporting evidence
quick look at the members of this group bolsters that assumption
Log into Facebook | Facebook
that and random stoopids
Not as disproportionately affected as they would be by the clinical needs and financial burden of a child brain damaged by a disease they can easily prevent if they didn't have their head in the sand. I don't think this is necessarily the right way to go about enforcing vaccination but given the weight of evidence supporting vaccination, lack of evidence supporting the fears underlying most anti-vaccine stances and, for me, the moral responsibility towards protecting not only your child but those around them should be something that carries more weight than it does.
what could possibly go wrongI would make it a requirement for access to schools
Lots. Which is why I'm not a legislator.what could possibly go wrong
Can't disagree with any of that.
I suppose more education is the only weapon against misinformation.
People are often immune to education when they've decided on something that they were pre-disposed to believe in anyway
Plenty of fuckers still believe in horoscopes, aliens, reiki, and whatever other illusory bullshit you're having yourself
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.