Franco
Well-Known Member
I saw a guy do massive projectile vomit outside the Dice Bar. To Arthur!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I mean, no one ever whinged about the Heineken Green Energy thing, and you'd kind of miss that now. So why doesn't guinness step in a fill the void properly.
Has anyone done the analysis on the gender breakdown of male/female/transgendered/neutered artists playing for Arthur's Day?
Heres a suggestion to the good folks of Guinness/Diageo. How about over the September bank holiday weekend have a guinness sponsored music festival. Something along the lines of HWCH where several venues are used and where a single ticket can get you entry to any. But with bigger, more mainstream acts. Maybe have the thing culminate in a big outdoor blowout down in Grand Canal Dock (or whether it was down there they were holding gigs last year).
I mean, no one ever whinged about the Heineken Green Energy thing, and you'd kind of miss that now. So why doesn't guinness step in a fill the void properly.
Or am I missing some wider point here?
I think the whole day for them on a national scale is much more valuable than a regular music festival, even if it was a music festival spread out over lots of venues with a huge attendance.
They get (hundreds of?) thousands of people into pubs, actively engaging with their brand (or at least that's how I'd imagine it would be termed in marketing speak).
Seems to me that this is a lot more desirable than gathering a load people in a field and making them drink only your brands. I'm sure the venues that have specific Arthur's Day events will only be serving Guinness etc. but there will be a lot of people out in other pubs too that have a choice of drink (and they'll see lots of people having great craic drinking pints of Guinness).
I don't think for a second that they expect to make back the money they put into this from sales of Guinness on the day. This is 100% about publicity and thats starting to backfire on them. Even if the anti-Arthur's day campaigns are a little nonsensical, they are gathering pace, to the extent that Diageo are contemplating having this be the last one.
I'm giving up Guinness for good this week. It usually tastes shite, does unspeakable things to my insides, and gives me a worse hangover than anything else.
Does anyone have any actual evidence for this idea that Diageo are thinking of abandoning it because of the backlash?
Edit: By 'it' I obviously mean 'Arthurs Day' and not 'Guinness'. Though if they abandoned Guinness that would be fine with me too.
Breo was the 90's no ?As a non-beer/ale drinker myself, is Guinness popular amongst the kids? Are Diageo seeing a long-term decline in sales?
If they kill Arthur's Day, it'll go the same way as that Bréo experiment they ran 20(?) years ago.
No more than the headline here:
http://www.irishtimes.com/news/soci...hur-s-day-as-backlash-gathers-force-1.1537705
Breo was the 90's no ?
They should bring that back actually. There was no market for blonde beers back then but there is now.
As a non-beer/ale drinker myself, is Guinness popular amongst the kids? Are Diageo seeing a long-term decline in sales?
Breo was the 90's no ?
They should bring that back actually. There was no market for blonde beers back then but there is now.
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.