1000smurfs
New Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2004
- Messages
- 693
deafmute said:get to the point then,a target for.....?
type 'legitimate target' into google
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
deafmute said:get to the point then,a target for.....?
I think it says something that you can reduce this:deafmute said:i think theres a vast difference between dumping a shitload of explosives on some random 3rd world country and a bunch of pissed off youths letting off a little steam by attacking the symbols of why theyre so pissed off and some minor destruction of property,a little perspective is needed on yr side.
and as for using violence as a tool to their own ends,you tryna suggest people worldwide just sit back and allow themselves be beaten down?
The perspective problem is on your side dude. It's obvious violence sits more comfortably on your conciense than mine. I'd be more from the Ghandi school of anarchism.deafmute said:i think theres a vast difference between dumping a shitload of explosives on some random 3rd world country and a bunch of pissed off youths letting off a little steam by attacking the symbols of why theyre so pissed off and some minor destruction of property,a little perspective is needed on yr side.
and as for using violence as a tool to their own ends,you tryna suggest people worldwide just sit back and allow themselves be beaten down?
Dixer said:I think it says something that you can reduce this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlNoEqO2mUY
to "a bunch of pissed off youths letting off a little steam".
Why act as an apologist for that?
Are you saying that what happened is acceptable?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgIlZgt4XV8
And for what its worth I think the selection of stuff destroyed today is a lot more 'random' than the 'random 3rd world country' in the analogy which you chose to adopt?deafmute said:i think theres a vast difference between dumping a shitload of explosives on some random 3rd world country and a bunch of pissed off youths letting off a little steam by attacking the symbols of why theyre so pissed off and some minor destruction of property,a little perspective is needed on yr side.
and as for using violence as a tool to their own ends,you tryna suggest people worldwide just sit back and allow themselves be beaten down?
1000smurfs said:When people say scumbags they dont necessarily imply they have a problem with working class people
deafmute said:very jumpy video so i gave up but im guessing the basic message is a bunch of young fellas broke into a car....?so what?
im saying that you all seem to have a major problem with working class youth expressing their anger at the system,if this had been an anti capitalist shindig with the same result it would have been back slapping all round.
Dixer said:And for what its worth I think the selection of stuff destroyed today is a lot more 'random' than the 'random 3rd world country' in the analogy which you chose to adopt?
deafmute said:and 90% of the rioters today were working class ergo calling them scumbags is implying a problem with them.
Antrophe said:Seriously reading back over this thread there a minute ago - it is frightening the levels of prejudice some of you lot have about working class youth.
Dixer said:Why are you conflating 'working class' with the scum that perpetrated todays violence? Yr the one making that connection. And yr way wrong to say: "if this had been an anti capitalist shindig with the same result it would have been back slapping all round". Thats patently ridiculous.
1000smurfs said:that would only be true if 90% of the working class were there today rioting.
i'd say the actual percentage was pretty low. Probably indistinguishable from zero
deafmute said:conflating???
and of course there would be some dissident pacifist voices but my `anti capitalist back slapping` stands true.
Happy Noodle Boy said:bigotry and naked aggression
deafmute said:not a republican at all but to show the logic of yr argument,what percentage of irish people as a whole took part in 1916 rising?probably indistinguishable from zero....
Dixer said:To conflate: To bring together; meld or fuse.
And this: "mercedes and bmw cars?foreign owned businesses,mcdonalds ulsterbank etc and all the while supermacs kept on serving food......not entirely random." is actually just crazy talk.
No longer a conversation worth having.
All the best.
1000smurfs said:Yes ! and does saying anything about those who took part
in the 1916 rising apply automatically to everyone else in ireland?
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.