nooleen
bad ape
it's a whole month
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"You are perfectly entitled to be against equality, but you can expect to be called out as a homophobe if you are favouring discrimination based on sexuality. Just like you would be called out as a racist if you were favouring discrimination based on skin colour."
poster Black Menorca finds this concept to be 'scary stuff' and 'orwellian'
Well enough people complained that the event, though not cancelled, has been decoupled from the social club and the fucking head of the company has had to send out an email saying it was a mistake to give the company's blessing to it. Fucking hate this planet.
boo I say. BOOProper order!
Work is for work. And internet!
I don't know any more. Can a company give a blessing in the first place?Are you saying boo or boo-urns?
Ah, hadn't realised it was a Civil Service job. That makes sense I suppose.The issue is coz it's gubbermint department, and the Civil Service is supposedly apolitical. Anyway the event is still unofficially going on and lots of businesses have donated amazing raffle prizes for the fund raising.
Ah, hadn't realised it was a Civil Service job. That makes sense I suppose.
I'm looking hard to try and find oneIt would make more sense if someone, anyone had proffered a coherent reason to vote no that isn't predicated upon homophobia.
that seems to be exactly the same collection of arguments except with "but AHA! I'M GAY! your move, liberals" tacked onto it
"The result of allowing same-sex couples to marry is that agencies that are entrusted with finding parents to adopt and foster children cannot legally favour families that can provide a mother and a father, which all evidence suggests is the best environment for children."
hasn't this been thoroughly debunked?
Prospective adoptive couples should be assessed on their own merits, people who argue that a straight couple would be better seem to discount the possibility that gay couple A may be better suited than straight couple B to raise a kid. They also seem to not realise that it's fucking hard to get approved to adopt a kid. There's plenty of gay couples c,d,e etc who may not be approved to adopt a kid for all sorts of reasons, much as with straight couples f,g,h. They don't just give babies to whoever wants one.
Also, this may be less common what with a higher percentage or adoptions being from abroad now, but the biological mother of both my sister and I were given the opportunity to choose who we went to. If someone decided that the best people to raise their baby was a gay couple who's business is it of some busybodies.
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.