hermie
Well-Known Member
But so what if it's ambiguous, it's supposed to be? I don't want to say too much but surely you see that we don't know the whole story yet. Did she know more or even less than she let on? Has she been got to by Cersei? Did her paranoia about Sansa really run so deep? I don't see how you can be so sure that she must now see that what he did for her was for her own good. There's no definitive evidence of that, as you say all is open to suggestion. And as to airing their most intimate details, the best lies always have an element of truth to them. We saw the same with all of the other testimony; twisting his words against him.The problem for me is that it was ambiguous as to whether she was lying out of fear or revenge. If it's the former, suggested by lots of cuts to Cersei during the outright lies about hearing Sansa and Tyrion plotting, then she must now realise that Tyrion was right all along to say King's Landing was too dangerous for them to be together.
But then why would she continue to not understand that he rejected her to protect them both? Why would she still think he wanted Sansa instead of her, when he obviously didn't? That's implausible. She lied about the crime for Cersei, but then airs their most intimate details to shame him - that wasn't necessary for the trial, that was revenge, and she seemed to be doing it from revenge - and Tyrion certainly thought it was unnecessary because it was only when she kept going after he begged her to stop that he finally snapped.
If it's spite, if she's doing it all for revenge, then that's even more implausible as no one could suddenly be that fucking evil - and why imply that Cersei has had a hand in it?
Either way, it's inconsistent. Bit like the rape in the septum, I think it's poor writing.