waterfall
New Member
Originally, my opinion on this was if you don't have a deal there's a reason you don't have a deal. Why would you go pouring your own (borrowed) money into releasing a single if the industry has not taken notice of any demo or gig to date?
I've seen a number of decent but not ground breaking bands release singles and some albums on their own bat. Inevitably, most fail. Some make it into the charts, usually on the strength of 5 purchases each by every friend/relation the band have. But after they fall back out of the charts, have they gained all that much?
But lately, it seems to me that the days of gigging and demoing, meeting the right people and getting a deal are gone. It's been pointed out to me that there's no excuse these days for a band that isn't organised enough and willing to take a chance and put something out. The recording, printing and promotion resources are there and much more accesible than ever. It's not that big an investment to put out a single, split 4 or 5 ways.
So if a label is presented with two good bands with equl potential, one band who flits between Crawdaddy gigs and TBMC basement rehearsals and another band who's saved up, recorded, promoted, organised launch gigs, got their mates, nieces, nephews, grannys etc to buy their single and got it in at number 14 giving them the beginnings of a fan base, which are they going to choose to invest in?
I completely change my mind on this bi-weekly.
I've seen a number of decent but not ground breaking bands release singles and some albums on their own bat. Inevitably, most fail. Some make it into the charts, usually on the strength of 5 purchases each by every friend/relation the band have. But after they fall back out of the charts, have they gained all that much?
But lately, it seems to me that the days of gigging and demoing, meeting the right people and getting a deal are gone. It's been pointed out to me that there's no excuse these days for a band that isn't organised enough and willing to take a chance and put something out. The recording, printing and promotion resources are there and much more accesible than ever. It's not that big an investment to put out a single, split 4 or 5 ways.
So if a label is presented with two good bands with equl potential, one band who flits between Crawdaddy gigs and TBMC basement rehearsals and another band who's saved up, recorded, promoted, organised launch gigs, got their mates, nieces, nephews, grannys etc to buy their single and got it in at number 14 giving them the beginnings of a fan base, which are they going to choose to invest in?
I completely change my mind on this bi-weekly.