unless she was underage, either for having sex or being depicted in a photo having sex, which apparently she was (17?)
so...there IS a crime here, possibly two crimes - statutory rape (if under 17) and distribution of child pornography (if under 18)
Oh for fuck sake come on. They got to you too ?
This is utter bullshit.
The law is very hazy when it comes to indecent exposure. But certainly it could be argued that, again, the blokes have committed an crime for nudity in relation to actions which may cause offence. The girl, assuming she kept her clothes on (I genuinely haven't been following it too closely), would not I don't think.
There's also a law about engaging in "lewd conduct" in public so shouldn't she be under arrest right now ?
I mean what's good for the fucking goose right ?