I have a question about this film that has been bugging me for ages.
Roger Ebert says that this film hangs on a name being used twice, once in the wrong context. I presume he was talking about how the prostitute and the girl from In Bruges both refer to him as Mr. Butterfly - meaning that the prostitute is in on the whole thing.
However, the prostitute calls him that because of his tattoo and the In Bruge lady call him that because of the incident when they were testing the gun, so it doesn't prove anything.
Am I right? Am I missing something?
However, the prostitute calls him that because of his tattoo and the In Bruge lady call him that because of the incident when they were testing the gun, so it doesn't prove anything.
Am I right? Am I missing something?