CD v. Vinyl, Zidane v. Cannavaro.
It's a war out there today on Thumped.
It's a war out there today on Thumped.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GORILLAMUNCH said:fine then, it's just you that's old
looking very cas' this morning, micker!
lucidman said:1. Vynil is so fashinate!!
2. Digital sound is always colder the analogue sound.
3. Anologue support overload makes the sound warmer and more powefull digital (cd/mp3) overload makes the sound crapp.
4. The best music release ever have been recorded on vynil support.
5. The best new bands release their music only on vynil.
6. I agree to almost everything said above.
How ever I never buy cd! Only vynil or downloads if I cannot find the vynil.
Lucidman
Nate Champion said:Egg and Nailer take a breather...
http://www.thumped.com/bbs/attachment.php?attachmentid=3717&stc=1&d=1152621479
That's Egg on the left. But Nailer gets my loving....
On our left.
Fashinate?lucidman said:1. Vynil is so fashinate!!
2. Digital sound is always colder the analogue sound.
3. Anologue support overload makes the sound warmer and more powefull digital (cd/mp3) overload makes the sound crapp.
4. The best music release ever have been recorded on vynil support.
5. The best new bands release their music only on vynil.
6. I agree to almost everything said above.
How ever I never buy cd! Only vynil or downloads if I cannot find the vynil.
Lucidman
Ah ask me bollocks. I'm trying to be clear. I don't talk down to anyoneBe the Hokey said:you can do something about being old, like not assuming the role of a lecturing parent by talking down to Mormon!
Is a heart that's true uncool now?Be the Hokey said:I have nothing to ask your bollocks, except perhaps why the terminal earnestness?
Fine so we are kind of agreed in principal that sampling an anologue signal results in lost information and that the sampling resolution among other things affects how much information is lost.egg_ said:Sampling is a simple enough thing (to understand at least, implementing a good a/d convertor isn't so simple), but signal processing isn't - basically what I'm saying is signal processing artefacts are so large that the effect of your "missing information" is negligible
egg_ said:(p.s. The resolution of tape isn't infinite either, the wave is stored by changing the orientation of magnetic domains, which aren't infinitely small)
Kinda, but of course there's always an infinite amount of information lost no matter what your sampling rate is.Mormon Nailer said:Fine so we are kind of agreed in principal that sampling an anologue signal results in lost information and that the sampling resolution among other things affects how much information is lost.
Pretty much, though it's not because the sampling rate is so high in absolute terms, just that it's sufficiently high (more or less) to cover the range of frequencies being sampledYou say that the sampling resolution is so high and that that there are so many other things happening anyway that getting hung up on a/d conversion is irrellevant - I'm paraphrasing right I hope.
egg_ said:Pretty much, though it's not because the sampling rate is so high in absolute terms, just that it's sufficiently high (more or less) to cover the range of frequencies being sampled
To explain this further I'd kinda need a pen and paper, and be able do some drawings ...
The fella who lectured electronics in my final year used to call it "the Nys-quith limit".hugh said:Here comes the Nyquist limit!
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.