Do you think yis have any chance?
who knows
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you think yis have any chance?
is that designed to turn the tide from private sector vs. public sector into public sector vs. public sector?Shit like this really doesn't help:
http://thepost.ie/news/lowerpaid-civil-servants-to-bear-brunt-of-pay-cuts-46458.html
it's got to be donewho knows
instead of hacking the legs off the govt and perpetuating the 'public vs private myth, i
what is this myth you are talking about?
that was referred to by some as 'turning the poor against the poor', or to the british govt. 'divide and conquer'. i think this whole notion of 'public vs. private' is the same political hand being dealt once more. thats the myth, and thats why its crazy to get into that fight.
so, you're saying the whole public/private thing has been made up? doesn't exist? or that there is no difference between them?
it definitely sends the frustration in the wrong direction. i.e its johhny public/private's fault that i lost my public/private job and/or have received or not received a pay cut/increase. thats the whole arguemnet. achieves fuck all. its a myth.
i think I understand you now. you're that someone who loses their job can't blame the government?
I was thinking you were saying something more complicated
i'm not saying that no. my latest take on this is that its like a modern if not still quite affluent version of the famine. everyone put all their faith in one thing, the construction/potato. the construction/potato failed. we didn't have a plan B. its probably just in our nature.
The widening productivity gap between the public and private sectors has cost the British taxpayer £58.4bn a year - half of the total raised in income tax.
how so?
it would be way quicker if you just explained to me why you think there is a real 'public vs. private', what is it, what are its functions, what is its likely outcome and who will benefit from it.
one is controlled by the state and the other isn't.
one is largely responsible for the delivery of public goods and maintaining the functioning of the state. the other is generally responsible for profit (although there are 3rd and 4th sector enterprises)
how the two interface is complicated and depends on different models of governance.
thats just a short description of how a country works. its not telling me why there should be such a thing as public vs private etc.
those stats prove nothing, they are from the boom years. they measure private in profit. at present private is an epic fail.
I think the answer is all these public services should be ran by private companies but be heavily regulated by a government body with the power to enforce it's decisions.
Public health care leaves people on trolleys, but it's more or less free. Privately ran hospitals charge outrageously mad prices but does a good job.
I think a combination of the two is what we need, but not in the way Mary Harney is trying to make a two tiered system.
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.