jane
Well-Known Member
I thought that was a joke. I, for one, didn't think anyone would accuse us -- except in jest -- of outright lying about sponsorship. We don't have any. We made a decision at the beginning not to look for any, and even if we had, we would not be looking for money from phone companies. I answered that, by the way, on a previous page. And the haircuts? That one is so ridiculous, I don't know where to begin. So yes, both of those things are made-up lies.Corm said:Okay, so it was a totally made-up, "lets-slag-off-the-Ladyfest" lie that organisers of the festival were talking about sponsorship from a ladies hair salon for free haircuts, and sponsorship from big phone companies? That was all totally made up? Wasn't even mentioned?
If people want to make constructive criticisms, base them on the context of what the festival is, not how you personally see DIY. Because it might embrace a version of DIY that isn't exactly what you might do, it does not mean it undermines the integrity of independence itself. It's just a different way of doing things. My definition of constructive comment does not extend to ridiculous statements phrased as accusations.
That it is not just for punks, or organised by only punks does not make it less punk, it makes it more diverse. It is a broad range of acts and events organised by a broad range of people. The way I see it is that no single one of us would have chosen the exact set of events we have means that it reflects an amazing group effort. You can choose to see it as diluting the 'punkness' of the punk bands, or you can see it as an opportunity to see all sorts of things you might not otherwise see. That's how I -- and a lot of others -- see it, anyway.