Obviously I've not heard all the evidence but I've been listening to the reports on the news most nights.
Seems a really flimsy case, I reckon he'll be acquitted.
Seems a really flimsy case, I reckon he'll be acquitted.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hard to know.
The defence seemed fairly unconvincing too.
The guy who was his alibi seemed very unwilling to commit to the exact time that he was with him.
I'm not sure how conclusive the phone mast location thing is but if the jury accept that then I reckon he'll get done for it.
All evidence & fact aside though,
....he totally fuckin' did it!
He 99.999999999% done it but I've a feeling he has a 50-50 chance to get off.
I wonder if the jury were shown his interview on the late late a few weeks after the murder. I saw that and within 1 minute said "he did it". It was so obvious.
jaysus! he was on the late late? wonder if thats on you tube?
On the news a while ago - "the jury are being asked to convict on the basis of a load of circumstantial evidence and a whiff of scientific evidence." I'd say he'll get off.
EDIT: Is there any site that gives a good overview of the whole case? There's no wikipedia on it and there's nothing much showing up in google.
He will be convicted on people's suspicion..which is not what courts are for, no matter how convinced we are of his guilt.
The whole thing really reminds me of the OJ trial.
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.