- Thread starter
- #41
Buzzo
Well-Known Member
Here's some links.... post more!
www.internationalwomensday.com
www.womensaid.ie
http://www.ifpa.ie/abortion/iabst.html
No? Ok I will!
Deadly interesting blog post on female genital mutilation
Incredibly resourceful post on feminisms on an amazing blog with fuckin LOADS of awesome links
I know groups like the CBI (spit) argued that women generally, as a whole, focussed on different education/career paths that happen to be less commercially valued by the current capitalist system. This doesn't reflect my views.
something just popped into my head as I type.... there have been numerous divorce cases recently where "big businessmen" had to pay shed loads of money to their wives. Is this the law courts recognising the value of intangibles as real inputs to value creation (from a capitalist perspective)?
One of the things that makes me slightly uncomfortable with the equal pay debate is that on the surface it doesn't attempt to recognise the value to society of intangibles such as caring, home-building, motherhood etc. which is really more valuable that any narrow interpretation of commercial skills.
i'll probably have to re-read what i just typed as it probably doesn't make sense.
It makes perfect sense man. The work that women traditionally do is ridiculously undervalued- particularly caring for people in the home (even caring for people professionally, and that's vastly improved in recent years). What's the carers allowance in this country again? Oh that's right, it's MEANS-TESTED!! A job where you're on call 24 hours a day, with high emotional and physical demands, fairly means tested, should means test you a pretty fucking hefty salary. I wonder what the situation would be if there were more women in government, or if it was a job that men traditionally do*.
*men, I am not blaming you personally so please don't respond like I have.