It Will Never Last
Well-Known Member
snap-apple said:Better WC? I'm not into the aesthetics, just think 5 african teams and 4 from central and north america is too many considering their ability. You don't see the South Koreans and Saudis in the rugby world cup like.
No, but you see Romania and Canada get their arse spanked. FIFA have a role in promoting the game worldwide, and if that means encouraging the lesser sides by having shite qualify for the WC so be it. We were a lesser side at one stage (and are back to being one IMO)
snap-apple said:But Tunisia, Angola, Togo, Saudis, T&T, Costa Rica and Iran... muck.
I notice you forgot to mention European muck like S&M and Poland, both of whom were worse than Tunisia, T&T and Iran. Japan were shit as well, suppose we tell them not to bother. Ecuador, Paraguay and the USA were pox, ain't just the spearchuckers (aka Linfield). Angola and Togo qualified for the WC for the first time, remember what that was like? Angola got to play their old colonial masters, just like us in our first WC, and gave a good account of themselves. T&T played well in their first two ties, Tunisia lead against the Spanish for 70 minutes (and were good for it too).
And its not about asthetics (well, kind of), if you have a problem with the quality of side coming from the lesser confederations who replaces them? I'd rather watch a game but naive Angola than a boring Danish/Russian side, or dare I say it, a shit Ireland. Like I said, only Turkey were missed at this WC from Europe, and I don't much like them cunts anyway.