- Joined
- Mar 21, 2004
- Messages
- 19,078
- Solutions
- 1
- Location
- in my head
- Website
- strikeaction.bandcamp.com
any artist that recieves money to have their music used in a marketing situation to try and sell something to someone should die.I think selling music for ads became acceptable and then kinda cool from the mid-to-late 1990s onward. I recall an article in a music magazine at the time, I think it were Select (RIP) that talked about the change in attitude. I think Belle and Sebastian or Arab Strap did music for a guinness advert at the time. The summation of the article was that while big bands like Radiohead could be all snooty about their songs being used while signed to Sony and selling millions of albums that lesser selling bands needed the money and/or exposure an ad would give.
I don't so much mind people's songs being used in ads but I hate the way lyrics are rewritten to make songs ad jingles. Most popular '60s and '70s songs seem to have been sodomised in this fashion.
in the face.
no, really, in one aspect i think it's a bit sick and horrible. if a band wants to ultimately shift more records or needs gig-goers and think that having their song soundtracked to an ad for how life-changing it can be to give your money to some financial institutional pricks and the attitude that 'well, if we dont do it, someone else will so we might as well make a few bob from it and hope people ask about the song'. well fine.
suckers of Satan's cock.
there ARE other ways around this, like, trying harder but if they want to go to hell, off with them.
maybe there's a line between who you'd let your music advertise for? like a government ad or a money hungry corporation.