Superbad (1 Viewer)

well yeah ok but only if it's possible to make money out of it will it be picked up on and that completely changes it, no?

Well... yeah, I see your point. But, looking at kiddie porn online means you are implicating yourself in the crime of pedophilia. Even if you dont pay to see the images.

That is a child in the image, and that child is being assaulted, and you are seeking out images of these crimes.
I dunno. Its wrong. Its not just a thought crime.

Mitchum will be along to explain why it is and should be a crime maybe.
 
Well... yeah, I see your point. But, looking at kiddie porn online means you are implicating yourself in the crime of pedophilia. Even if you dont pay to see the images.

I'm not saying it's not legally a crime because it is legally a crime.

That is a child in the image, and that child is being assaulted, and you are seeking out images of these crimes.
Sure, but you are not creating the images of these crimes. Did anyone who saw the images of american soldiers torturing prisoners go to jail? What if they approved of them in their heads?

I dunno. Its wrong. Its not just a thought crime.
I think it's wrong as well but that's not what I'm getting at. If you saw a snuff film would that automatically mean you enjoy killing people?

In this case the judge has even determined that he's not a paedophile so why are people upset that that he's only getting a small sentence?

Really i just feel a bit sorry for the guy who doesn't appear to have hurt anyone but has had his entire life destroyed, I think he needs help not lifelong punishment
 
It's an unsavoury topic and not one that people like to think about which is exactly why it SHOULD be thought about



what a way to spend a friday night
 
Arg.
I dunno why it should be a crime, and looking at a picture of someone robbing a car is not a crime.

But, basically, I think looking at kiddie porn should be a crime. It is right and just that it is. Even if you dont directly support the crime via payment or whatever, by viewing it you are implicating yourself in that crime.

Somehow.




Magically.

I dunno. I am just a code monkey. Don't listen to me sure.
 
I've been driving for about four hours so this might not make any sense but anyways.
Sure, but you are not creating the images of these crimes. Did anyone who saw the images of american soldiers torturing prisoners go to jail? What if they approved of them in their heads?
Difference being that those soldiers weren't being tortured so that they could take pictures of them.

Anyways, i understand what you're saying but i disagree all the same. Child abuse is just about the worst shit going so i've no pity for anyone involved in it. I mean, it sucks for yer man that he was originally a victim and i'm sure that's fucked him up and contributed fairly majorly to where he finds himself now, but plenty of other victims don't go down this route so it's not that great an excuse.

Anyways, i need sleep.
 
the crime is not in looking at the pictures - it's the "making a copy" bit. which you do when you view anything on the internets.
 
Difference being that those soldiers weren't being tortured so that they could take pictures of them.

but by that logic if someone was abusing a child anyway and decided to take pictures one time those pictures are ok cos he or she wasn't abusing the child for the purpose of pictures

Anyways, i understand what you're saying but i disagree all the same. Child abuse is just about the worst shit going so i've no pity for anyone involved in it. I mean, it sucks for yer man that he was originally a victim and i'm sure that's fucked him up and contributed fairly majorly to where he finds himself now, but plenty of other victims don't go down this route so it's not that great an excuse.
yeah but I still don't see how he abused anyone

the crime is not in looking at the pictures - it's the "making a copy" bit. which you do when you view anything on the internets.

so it's one in the same? is the possession a crime or is it the production of?
 
so it's one in the same? is the possession a crime or is it the production of?


Both. Technically i suppose you can look at something without being "in possession" of it but i believe the legislation on kiddy fiddler pics in ireland refers to "making a copy" which is what anyone caught downloading it gets done for. And it's not just photos or videos - you know those oh-so funny Simspons porn cartoons? Some of those would be considered "an image" of child pornography under the terms of the act.

Brian Lenihan said:
Under the Act, the possession, distribution, importation and exportation or sale of all forms of child pornography - films, video or material in written or auditory form including material produced or transmitted via the internet - are offences with penalties of up to 14 years' imprisonment. Mere possession of child pornography can be punishable by imprisonment for up to 5 years. Using a child or allowing a child to be used for the production of child pornography is also punishable by up to 14 years' imprisonment.
 
Gorillamunch has made paedophiles of us all!

Sorry lads but child abuse is child abuse, hope you're all turning yourselves in
 
bart lisa and millhouse would never have that threesome
if there weren't people out there demanding to see it

i can't believe i'm being CENSORED BY GEOCITIES!"!!!!
 
I thought it was great with some very clever dialogue, good characters and some genuine emotional scenes.

I also laughed out loud quite a few times which is exactly what a comedy should make you do.

Mitchum if you dismiss almost every film that comes out of Hollywood do you not think that you are missing out on a lot of good films?

Is it not the same as dismissing every album that doesn't come out on an independant label?
 
Superbad was easily the best comedy I've seen in yonks. It never lagged despite being over 2 hours long, had real soul, and beats the shit out of the much more hyped Knocked Up. Anyone looking to smile go see this movie!!
 
Mitchum if you dismiss almost every film that comes out of Hollywood do you not think that you are missing out on a lot of good films?

Is it not the same as dismissing every album that doesn't come out on an independant label?

That's a straw man argument. You've presumed wrongly that I'm trashing films I've not seen.
For the fourth time, I'm basing my point on Apatow films I've seen (and the trailer for Superbad) as representative for the genre as whole.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Activity
So far there's no one here
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Support thumped.com

Support thumped.com and upgrade your account

Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...

Upgrade now

Latest threads

Latest Activity

Loading…
Back
Top