Unknown Convict
Well-Known Member
it's late but i can't let this one go.
i just re-read the 6N thread and there seemed to be a general acceptance from the pro-rugby voices, including me, that rugby does have an issue with doping.( i don't know who was named in this thread earlier, but there's a named irish player in the 6N thread.) off the top of my head, i could name half a dozen players (non-irish) who i think are doping and, with some thought, a whole lot more.
the core of rugby remains the club, staffed and played by amateurs like @hermie , for the enjoyment of the game and the camaraderie. money = corruption is a hackneyed truism.
both blood and urine, in and out of competition, as far as i know.
@scutter - what do you mean by doping? obvs. EPO / HGH / etc. are but do you consider nutritional supplements doping if they're not explicitly banned or are considered to be within the bounds of what's acceptable? the current accepted definition seems based on breaking prescribed rules as opposed to improving ones physique by any legitimate means but what's valid in one sport may not be in another.
if doping were more prevalent in rugby, i'd expect fewer injuries and quicker recovery times, but pro players these days can expect to spend between 20% and 40% of their time out injured. sure, rugby players are bigger, fitter and taller than ever before (no player under 6ft. started against SA recently), but that's true of the first world in general regardless of strength and conditioning, diet, lifestyle, etc. all of which are carefully managed in the modern pro.
i think kimmage is out of his depth/comfort zone here and is attempting to apply the logic of a sport he does know to one which he has admitted (e.g. on newstalk last weekend) he knows nothing about and has little interest in. merely throwing accusations at 'unnamed' players (whose identity even a fool could figure out from kimmage's non-naming description of him) should not be enough to warrant genuine suspicion and it certainly doesn't from me. i thought kimmage was better than that and there's an air of tilting at windmills about this.
And the backlash Kimmage is getting reminds me of the backlash against me when I mentioned it here.
i just re-read the 6N thread and there seemed to be a general acceptance from the pro-rugby voices, including me, that rugby does have an issue with doping.( i don't know who was named in this thread earlier, but there's a named irish player in the 6N thread.) off the top of my head, i could name half a dozen players (non-irish) who i think are doping and, with some thought, a whole lot more.
Rugby, like every other professional sport, has been corrupted by money, and is rotten to the core.
the core of rugby remains the club, staffed and played by amateurs like @hermie , for the enjoyment of the game and the camaraderie. money = corruption is a hackneyed truism.
does anyone know what kind of tests they administer? just urine or do they take blood as well?
both blood and urine, in and out of competition, as far as i know.
@scutter - what do you mean by doping? obvs. EPO / HGH / etc. are but do you consider nutritional supplements doping if they're not explicitly banned or are considered to be within the bounds of what's acceptable? the current accepted definition seems based on breaking prescribed rules as opposed to improving ones physique by any legitimate means but what's valid in one sport may not be in another.
if doping were more prevalent in rugby, i'd expect fewer injuries and quicker recovery times, but pro players these days can expect to spend between 20% and 40% of their time out injured. sure, rugby players are bigger, fitter and taller than ever before (no player under 6ft. started against SA recently), but that's true of the first world in general regardless of strength and conditioning, diet, lifestyle, etc. all of which are carefully managed in the modern pro.
i think kimmage is out of his depth/comfort zone here and is attempting to apply the logic of a sport he does know to one which he has admitted (e.g. on newstalk last weekend) he knows nothing about and has little interest in. merely throwing accusations at 'unnamed' players (whose identity even a fool could figure out from kimmage's non-naming description of him) should not be enough to warrant genuine suspicion and it certainly doesn't from me. i thought kimmage was better than that and there's an air of tilting at windmills about this.