Coronavirus: Better Call Sol - CORONAMANIA (4 Viewers)

waiting on a test itself. my aunt got tested, but before the rush started; she was told that if there was a positive result, she'd hear within 48 hours, but if it was negative, there might be a longer wait. i think she got the negative result four days later.
 
It's just something I saw on the web today I didn't make it and I barely comprehend what 0 and 1 are supposed to mean if they can mean anything at all let alone the rest of those weird squiggles or colored lines whichever way they are supposed to be going. We are still in the upwards curve and unlikely to see the affects of our measures until another week or so. I suppose the graph is trying to show a predicted growth rate of new cases here roughly if we were to follow on at the same rate that we have been. Weather they have successfully done so or been accurate I don't know.
 
It's just something I saw on the web today I didn't make it and I barely comprehend what 0 and 1 are supposed to mean if they can mean anything at all let alone the rest of those weird squiggles or colored lines whichever way they are supposed to be going. We are still in the upwards curve and unlikely to see the affects of our measures until another week or so. I suppose the graph is trying to show a predicted growth rate of new cases here roughly if we were to follow on at the same rate that we have been. Weather they have successfully done so or been accurate I don't know.
It looks about right, i've been checking this Mirror article which had projections last week and we were 150+ cases or so ahead all weekend, we'll see what today brings though.


Growth numbers if 30% continues
March

18TH - 292

19TH - 380

20TH - 494

21ST - 642

22ND - 834

23RD - 1084

24TH - 1409

25TH - 1831

26TH - 2380

27TH - 3094

28TH - 4022

29TH - 5228

30TH - 6796

31ST - 8834

April

1ST - 11484

2ND - 14929

3RD - 19407

4TH - 25229

5TH - 32797

6TH - 42636

7TH - 55426

8TH - 72054

9TH - 93670

10TH - 121771

11TH - 158302
 
how many days behind are the test results though?
its hard to know, given the level of transparency they're going with.

the predicted curve was to be 30%, day-on-day, with Varadkar predicting ~180k cases by the end of March.

They prioritise healthcare workers (25% of all +ive cases) and those showing the most serious symptoms, which adds bias in both direction, hence probably offsets.

I don't see how we get from this 7% figure to suddenly having 1 million cases. Maybe that was worst case, I dunno.

There are approx 40k on the waiting list. It will hold at roughly that, and eventually drop, once cases are processed. If they manage to hit the 15k tests per day mark, which they're aiming for, they'll be able to test a lot more folk, obvs. Not sure how they'd prioritise that though, once those with symptoms have been looked after. There are probably also follow-up tests required before someone can be given the all-clear (which is why I presume there are so few who've already been given the all-clear).

The other thing is, those with the most serious symptoms are already known. Like, you don't lie there not being able to breathe, waiting 5-6 days for a test. Those people are seen to immediately. As they say, being diagnosed with the virus doesn't change your recovery efforts in any way. You still remain at home, you still self-isolate til better. Just, contact tracing kicks in and, as I mentioned before, this is proving much easier, as we're all only in contact with a couple of people.

I dunno. The above is based on what they're telling us. They obviously know a lot more. I'd tend to feel pretty positive about things, especially considering we're a few days away from being over the testing from before social distancing came into effect. Its safe to assume less contagion took place after that point.
 
It's just something I saw on the web today I didn't make it and I barely comprehend what 0 and 1 are supposed to mean if they can mean anything at all let alone the rest of those weird squiggles or colored lines whichever way they are supposed to be going ...
That graph is comparing the number of known COVID cases to what the number of cases would be if the increase in cases was exponential - look at the Y-axis on the left, each marking is 10 times larger than the previous one. It's not really saying anything useful, it's just comparing actual growth versus what the growth would be if it followed a particular mathematical rule. It looks like they match up, more or less, but because the scale gets 10 times larger as you move up the graph the error margin gets larger too, so the graph says more-or-less nothing at all
 
harsh but fair
History will vindicate me.

220px-Charles_Edward_Trevelyan.jpg
 
Baffled as to why, under the new measures announced, only outdoor social gatherings of more than four people are banned. Does this make it okay for four of us to get together and drink cans on the canal? Surely not .....
 

colour me sceptical; "If the results are confirmed, they imply that fewer than one in a thousand of those infected with Covid-19 become ill enough to need hospital treatment "
lombardy has a population of 10m - less that one in one thousand would imply less than 10k people needing hospitalisation, yet they've seen 5k deaths already, and 30k+ cases.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Activity
So far there's no one here

21 Day Calendar

Lau (Unplugged)
The Sugar Club
8 Leeson Street Lower, Saint Kevin's, Dublin 2, D02 ET97, Ireland

Support thumped.com

Support thumped.com and upgrade your account

Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...

Upgrade now

Latest threads

Latest Activity

Loading…
Back
Top