My opinion, based on empirical observation. His position at first seemed to be based on ‘look, trans activists physically attack feminists! They’re awful people’. Looking into most of these incidents (I’m not about to cite any here, you have Google) they’re the result of provocation: trans people being denied their existence. Because they’re not ‘real women’.I'm a bit fuzzy on the TERF wars and the whole Glinner mess so I might be going off-topic, but is the argument you're characterising there your opinion or the opinion of the anti-Glinners? Isn't it a bit of a dodgy stance? For example, like, say, in cases of domestic violence? i.e. "she drove me to it."
He’s more than clarified his position since. You can look at his own feed the last few days and see the rubbish he’s been spewing for yourself.