- Joined
- Dec 31, 2000
- Messages
- 17,098
what about jaap stam, you cunt, he wasn't cheap.and you forgot carrick, saha, yorke, cole, that's your 53 mil there
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what about jaap stam, you cunt, he wasn't cheap.and you forgot carrick, saha, yorke, cole, that's your 53 mil there
you're right. it all seems a bit fishy to me.what about jaap stam, you cunt, he wasn't cheap.
probably able to spell it, mind.you could be right. it's highly unlikely a pool fan would be able to work an excel spreadshhet.
probably able to spell it, mind.
I was surprised to see man ure have a lower net spend than the pool but i suppose they have recouped quite a bit selling for big fees where as pool get fuck all when they sell. I'd guess owen is the most expensive at £8m, anyone think of someone more expensive?
there's no way liverpool have spent more than united, this is the net spend, after sales too. united have also made a lot more on sales. 17 mil for becks, 16 for stam, 14 for veron, etc. still you spend big, you're more likely to sell big. unless it's djibrill cisse, of course.Liverpool fans in denial shocker!!!!
an age ago i saw (on a liverpool website) the total list of players that benitez alone has bought and sold. He has made an absolute fuckload of small signings for a million or two.
question it all you like, but liverpool have spent a shitload of money. and the fact that all you pool fans are questioning it is comical, can you not accept that you have spent a lot and are no nearer to winning the league ? I would like to see the figures broken down further because manu would have definetly made more on the sales of players i would think. This would bring uniteds spending to probably more then liverpools but and the end its the net value thats important.
One question though, why does benitez appear to be getting shitter the more money he spends ? He won the champions league with a team consisting of 2 or 3 of his own signings.
Also do you think the loss of paco is affecting tactics etc this season ?
As far as I know leeds nerver got the €30m or there abouts for Rio it was closer to €20m and they are still paying for Rooney.
It'd be interesting to see a comparison of the wages the clubs are paying.
so that's a net of 56 mil over 6 years = less than 10 mil net a year. is that it?True about the outlays of Newcastle and Spurs against zero return but Liverpool fans are always very quick to defend their club to the extent it makes them blind.
I fond this on a liverpools stats site
Houllier's transfer dealings In total, he bought 39 players for £110m and sold 47 for £54m.
Face it the pool spent hell of a lot of money I don't thik the figures are made up they might not be 100% but I would say it is close.
Also about the Gunners a lot of the players they bought are undisclosed fees
I was thinking that.
I know there are a few players on €140k a week at chelsea. Uniteds top paid get €120k.
Don't know about the rest but it would be intresting to see.
newcastle really are thick as fuck if they're still paying keirons wages.I fond this in an a story about Terry signing his new deal earlier this season
1 John Terry Chelsea £135,000 a week
2= Andriy Shevchenko Chelsea
2= Michael Ballack Chelsea £121,000
4 Steven Gerrard Liverpool £120,000
5 Cristiano Ronaldo Man Utd £119,000
6= Wayne Rooney Man Utd
6= Michael Owen Newcastle £110,000
8= Frank Lampard Chelsea
8= Rio Ferdinand Man Utd £100,000
10= Fernando Torres Liverpool
10= Didier Drogba Chelsea £90,000
12= Jamie Carragher Liverpool
12= Michael Essien Chelsea
12= Kieron Dyer Newcastle £80,000
newcastle really are thick as fuck if they're still paying keirons wages.
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.