snakybus
Well-Known Member
you girls need to have some babies and gain some perspective
and shave yer legs
and shave yer legs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mumblin Deaf Ro said:Ok, I have work to do. Will check in again before i go home.
jane said:My dad even beat the Vatican, too!
He was tried for heresy because of his objections to the Humanae Vitae. HERESY, I tell you!
Mumblin Deaf Ro said:Both people have to accept that they have caused a pregnancy. If the man does not want his child aborted then i think it is deeply unfair and unjust for the woman to be able to go ahead and do it without his consent. Unwanted pregnancy is never easy, but both adults still have to accept responsibility for it.
Ok, I have work to do. Will check in again before i go home.
jane said:Fine, unwanted pregnancy is never easy, but because it is physically harder on the person with the womb, she should have a bit more say in the matter than simply acceeding to her partner's wishes. Because that's what veto is. It's a power to invalidate all other positions.
Unwanted pregnancy is truly never easy, but a child should be a choice and not a punishment for anyone.
Mumblin Deaf Ro said:jane we're going around in circles. I think we both know how each other feels about this topic at this stage.
glen said:How about if the lady gets up the duff and the gentleman wants her to abort?
jane said:How is a nation of 'mummy's boys' the antithesis of patriarchy?
Because if really, it was, then the laydeez would long ago have shoved those boys aside and would be occupying far more than 13% of the seats in Dail Eireann.
jane said:The reason we're going around in circles is that you fail to see the lack of logic in your argument that giving someone veto power over someone else's life is anything like 'equal say'.
Jane it took me a long time to come around to a pro-choice position - so you're saying that I had anti-abortion inclinations when I was younger because I think women are whores and liars? How wrong you arejane said:Just that it is underlined by an attitude that women are viewed with suspicion, and need to be protected from themselves. Sometimes it's not about women's wombs, but often, it is. And when it's about women's wombs, it's about protecting women from their own inherent unruliness. It's a reality that this attitude exists. I didn't make it up, and it's not a problem with my 'tone'. My 'tone' is not off. I am pointing out a problem, but just because I'm pointing it out, doesn't mean I am responsible for its existence. If you want, I can go all day and show you very specific examples, beginning with early recorded history, and continuing up to the present day. But do I have to do all that work just for my statement to be validated? I hope not.
Wilbert said:playing the womb card
what he saidegg_ said:Jane it took me a long time to come around to a pro-choice position - so you're saying that I had anti-abortion inclinations when I was younger because I think women are whores and liars? How wrong you are
egg_ said:Jane it took me a long time to come around to a pro-choice position - so you're saying that I had anti-abortion inclinations when I was younger because I think women are whores and liars? How wrong you are
You might not have meant to say that, and I realise you probably don't think that, but that's the clear implication of your argumentjane said:No, I didn't say that
Of course. Do you believe all men are sexist? Of course not. But that's where the rant about controlling women's bodies leads. You get personal when someone talks about wombs (your womb), I get personal when someone talks about men's (my) attitude to womenDo you believe that sexism exists?
jane said:Do you believe that sexism exists?
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.