Evil_g
Member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2009
- Messages
- 41
No idea at all?
For real?
Hating the Iraq war does not mean giving Assad a pass here. The situations are completely different.
Well apart from "Because Cameron said so".
Who would benefit from such an act? Most reports suggested that Assad was winning the civil war. He would have known the consequences of deploying chemical weapons. He would have desired to avoid giving the US and UK an excuse to get involved.
It would not make sense to do so.
There are many other parties for whom it would be very convenient if he did so. Not least the people who are telling us that he did, such as David Cameron and John Kerry.
Last week there was a lot of doubt being expressed as to who was responsible for these actions.
This week the debate has moved on to Assad did this so we must invade Syria.
I don't know how we've gotten from a state of doubt as to who was responsible to a state of certainty that Assad was responsible. I have seen no new information.
So, yes I am for real.
You're the one talking about dropping bombs on people, y'know, killing them, or maybe just blowing their legs off, so I'd like to at least know why?