stuff about music companies and bombs (1 Viewer)

Anthony

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Since 2000
Joined
Nov 7, 2000
Messages
19,424
Solutions
1
Location
Vanav
Website
www.themiddleagesband.com
MUSICAL SHARES
“The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic
hallway where thieves and pimps run free and good men (sic) die like
dogs for no good reason... there’s also a negative side.” - Hunter S.
Thompson


Spare a thought this week for the poor old music industry, which seems
to have spent most of its publicity budget this year on advertising the
fact that it cannot sell records. Not only that, but apparently it’s
the punter who’s at fault for downloading stuff off the net for free
and the artists who are milking the record companies dry. Yeah, right.
Andy Taylor, head of Sanctuary, the only substantial independent record
label left in the UK, disagrees: “Sales of recorded music account for a
third of the whole market, which also includes tours and merchandise as
well as the use of music in commercials and films.” He goes on to
quote statistics to show that global income from music increased by
almost 10% in 2001. Taylor argues that the music industry’s problems
stem from the corporate takeover that took place in the 1990s, when
numerous small but healthy independent labels were swallowed up by
major label budgets, squashing any long-term development of
artists. “The easiest thing to do was produce short-term products that
would give short-term growth,” says Taylor. “It’s become like the
Christmas toy market.”


In today’s rhythmically globalised world, record production and sales
are controlled almost entirely by five fat cat multinational companies
intent on selling an easy-for-your-ears, empty-of-substance commodity.
Why don’t we take a quick run through the hit parade of corporations
trying to monopolise our ‘entertainment’: There’s AOL Time Warner (who
own Atlantic, Elektra, Sire, Maverick among others); Vivendi Universal
(MCA, Polygram, Geffen, Interscope, Motown); Sony (CBS, Epic);
Bertelsmann (BMG, Arista, RCA), and EMI (Capitol, Chrysalis, Virgin,
Parlophone). It’s the new monsters of rock.


Vivendi Universal are about to merge with US TV network NBC, who happen
to be owned by General Electric - manufacturers of engines for war
planes used to bomb Afghanistan and Iraq, and donors of $1.1 million to
our much-loved Republican Party. Vivendi Universal also has links to
Espelsa who develop mission planning systems for arms manufacturers
Lockheed Martin and British Aerospace. And the latest is that their
music division isn’t doing so well, so they might soon be flogging it
off to another corporation.


Keeping it in the corporate family, AOL Time Warner are currently
negotiating with EMI to sell off Warner Music (Madonna, Red Hot Chilli
Peppers, Missy Elliot). And of course, AOL is involved in the arms
industry through Hughes Electronic Corps and bombmakers, Raytheon
Industries. AOL and Time Warner, who together have donated $1.6 million
to the Bush administration, merged in 2000 to form the fourth largest
company in the world, generating more income than the output of Russia
or the Netherlands. Meanwhile, Sony is in joint venture with the US
Army to develop advanced training simulations equipment, and The Power
Corporation of Canada, a major shareholder in BMG, is involved in the
production of parts for fighter aircraft and other military vehicles.
So the arms business is the new rock’n’roll then.


Dollar Notes
In the corporate boardrooms music is another commodity and the artists
that create it are no more than a tool that they can use to tap into
difficult markets. Record contracts are so watertight and royalties so
low that it is only the really big stars - and the record execs - who
ever earn a penny from record sales, so that’s why the average musician
isn’t that worried about piracy. The man behind such musical greats as
Steps, Pete Waterman (who once bought 18 Ferraris in one day) said: “As
Mark Twain said, ‘Feed a starving dog and it won’t bite you.’ That’s
the principal difference between an artist and a dog.”


Music only becomes valuable when it can be used to sell other products.
Mainstream success story David Gray says: “It’s staggering the amount
of money you’re offered, but music is more important than selling
mashed potatoes or a dodgy jacket made in the Philippines.” He chose
to say no. Last year Chumbawumba were offered, and turned down,
$350,000 by General Electric to use their hit ‘Tubthumping’ in an
advert for air conditioning. They explained “It’s not hard to dig up
info on companies and sometimes it just stares you in the face. When we
were in New York in January there was a huge NO SWEAT banner hanging
from a building in Times Square. In great big bold letters it urged
shoppers not to buy Gap because they use sweatshop labour. Are Madonna
and Missy Elliot dancing to Gap’s tune because they have no idea what
conditions the jeans they are flogging are made under? It’s doubtful
either of them would end up behind a counter or pulling pints if they
didn’t make the advertising revenue.”


Other British acts, unable to get on radio playlists and so denied
performance royalties as a source of income, are desperate to break
into a hostile US market, and are less conscientious. Badly Drawn Boy
linked up with badly made clothing company Gap, with his music featured
on one of their ads, while Coldplay (who told the world to “make trade
fair’) sold off ‘Yellow’ to be used by ABC television. John Harlow, a
partner in the advertising agency Naked explains: “The commercial brand
world used to be quite a dirty word. Artists in the old days would
say, ‘I don’t want to be involved with that.’ But the dynamics have
changed. Records sales are right down. There is a new era of
collaboration.”


Likewise, when once a band could turn up at a gig and insist the
promoter take down the banner advertising a dodgy beer company before
they would go on stage, now they are booked to play at the Carling
Weekend in Reading and Leeds, or at the Carling Academy in Liverpool,
or the Carling Apollo in Hammersmith. In the UK Carling, owned by US
brewer Coors (investors in GM barley; right wing anti-union, anti-gay
lobbyists...), are collaborating with corporate promoters Mean Fiddler
and Clear Channel to sponsor venues and festivals to make the music
industry profitable for them and turn festivals into soulless
landscapes and extensions of a shopping trip. Pop has finally eaten
itself and now it’s in the toilet with its fingers down its throat.


* For more on Clear Channel: www.clearchannelsucks.org and www.rancid-
news.co.uk


* For more on why the Mean Fiddler suck check out
www.squall.co.uk/squall.cfm?sq=2002062501&ct=5


* For more on the melodious links between the music and the arms
industry see: www.cstrecords.com/html/uxo.html
 
that's all absolutely true, and hardly news, but very much worth repeating all the same. just thought i'd point out that this...

Anthony said:
For more on the melodious links between the music and the arms industry see: www.cstrecords.com/html/uxo.html
...has some mistakes in it, which are explained here: http://www.cstrecords.com/html/yanquiartworknote.html. it's also probably already out of date, seeing as the shifting world of corporate takeovers and horsetrading means nothing stays the same for long.

in 1994, maximumrocknroll did a whole issue on the "big six" (as they were then) and gave the following "who owns who" graphic to explain: http://www.arancidamoeba.com/mrr/whoownswho.html.

briefly, since then, the big six have become the big five (quick aside for fugazi's "five corporations": http://zena.secureforum.com/interactive/creative/lyrics_display_frame.cfm?itemID=1514&displayType=song) and will probably soon become the big four, seeing as e.m.i. and b.m.g. have already attempted a merger once already (http://media.guardian.co.uk/mergers/story/0,7521,481447,00.html) and will either attempt it again soon or else will merge with warner if aol/time warner sells off warner music. more at http://media.guardian.co.uk/newmedia/story/0,7496,902568,00.html.

and one of the other considerations is distribution: independent labels basically handing over distro to big-five affiliates, which gets quite easily forgotten.

gearhead nation did an excellent issue about this back in the day (is there a link pete?).
 
tom. said:
gearhead nation did an excellent issue about this back in the day (is there a link pete?).
finbar took the old GN's offline ages ago... don't know if the one of which you speak was ever online... BUT I KNOW A MAN WHO MIGHT....
 
SOME LATE NEWS

The Punk Superpoints Club has been cancelled due to confusion with regard to the rules. The club was an attempt to find the people who were the most punk and reward them accordingly. Unfortunately, as is the nature of punk, everybody made up their own rules and confusion has reigned ever since. Depending upon your point of view going to or not going to The Old Chinaman would mean you were awarded punk points. Similarly, if you boycott, or go to, every Hope gigs you get the same points. Aspiring punk heroes and heroines were awarding themselves bonus points for doing u-turns and being extra hypocritical. As a result of this scheme it is now estimated that 94% of the weight of the book of punk is Tip-ex.
From GN 31. So true.
 
If you look on archive.org only issues 30-32 were ever online and they don't seem to have the article tom. was talking about.

I'll ask finbar next week when he's back from study leave if he has the issue in question typed up at home somewhere...
 
pete said:
finbar took the old GN's offline ages ago... don't know if the one of which you speak was ever online... BUT I KNOW A MAN WHO MIGHT....


It was GN 36, april '97. It's not on the web (I'll scan it over the next couple of days if I get a chance). In the meantime here's one of the articles...

Majors.............................................................................................by pete

There are two reasons continually put forward for not buying anything from a major label. One is the treatment recieved by bands who sign. But as far as I'm concerned, anyone who signs a contract of any description should know full well what they are getting into before they sign on the dotted line. Major labels are businesses, and the sole function of evry business is to generate profit.? Sure the band will only get a tiny share of profit from their sales. How sad. They should have known that before they signed. That's hat they're lawyers are paid for. Secondly, a reason often given are the dodgy business practises which these labels are linked with. Fair enough - we all know about them. But this should be a reason for shaping attitudes towards a lot more than record labels. Stupid bastards don't just help EMI, y'know. There's a fine line between taking an ethical stance on a subject and narrow minded self-righteousness. It's the easiest thing in the world for Joe Punkrocker to criticise someone for buying a major label release. After all, he can see the video on MTV. And if he wants to hear more he can get a copy of the album from his ethically challenged friend who bought the cd in HMV, of all places...how could he!!! - that way he can keep his own hands clean. The main thing is that he didn't pay for a major label release. And he can tell all his friends about it. Frequently. Then he can sit back and watch the latest Fox Network (owned by Rupert Murdoch's News International) on his Sony tv (bought on HP from Thorn EMI) while drinking his Coke (the real thing of course) or maybe a coffee (mmm...Maxwell House). Or just maybe have a quick read of the entertainment pages in the Sun (News International, again). See if there are any good movies on in town (Sony pictures with agreat soundtrack out now on Epic). Travel to the cinema on a bus spewing diesel fumes (fuel supplied by Shell). Have a Mars bar and a Yorkie in the cinema and more Coke too. then maybe stop off in McDonalds on the way home for a Big Mac and fries, and maybe more Coke. Hey, there's time for a drink, so nip into the pub for a few pints. So then it's back home to veg out and fall asleep with MTV on. Another day in the life of a committed punkster ends. Sleeping soundly in the knowledge that regardless of all the shit that is going on in the world, the main thing is that he doesn't support major labels.
 
and one of the other considerations is distribution: independent labels basically handing over distro to big-five affiliates, which gets quite easily forgotten.
According to Frank Zappa, a man who had legal battles with ALL the major labels, it is a good idea for an indie to get distributed by the majors, otherwise you will have a lot of difficulty getting paid
 
is it possible to live a life that is 100% not engaged with any type of exploitation? Not buying something cause its on a major label is one form of protest. then again it kinda misses the point unless you attempt (fugazi-like) to conduct yr day to day life in a way that does not interact with the corporation/the machine/the man. As i type this i just realized that i'm wearing converse that were probably made by a 5 year old in macau. so much for the moral high ground! I am a conspiracy theorist though (conspiracy theory just being another kind of belief system/faith) so I am suspicious of all things popular. what about you?
 
Universal Music to cut 1,350 jobs

[font=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif]Mark Tran
Thursday October 16, 2003


[/font][font=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif]Universal Music, the world's largest record company, is to axe 1,350 jobs - or 11% of its workforce - in response to a relentless fall in global music sales.


Universal's competitors already have undergone painful cuts of their own in recent months. Sony Music Entertainment laid off 1,000 people, or 10% of its global work force, in March. EMI has eliminated about 1,900 jobs, or about 19% of its total, since late 2001.

In all, nearly 8,000 jobs - one in five - have gone from the five major record companies - and more big cutbacks are in the pipeline if any of the mergers under discussion bear fruit.

"[Universal Music] is in the process of instituting significant cost-cutting initiatives that take into account the realities of the declining music market to further rationalise the company's cost structure around the world," the firm said in a statement.

Home to stars such as Eminem and Sheryl Crow, Universal Music is part of France's struggling media giant Vivendi. Vivendi recently sold most of its US entertainment assets to General Electric's NBC but kept the music business on hopes of a recovery in music sales.

Doug Morris, Universal Music chairman and chief executive, blamed the round of layoffs on piracy.

"This is really a direct result of ... the physical and internet piracy which is causing tremendous suffering in the music business," Mr. Morris said.

The music business has suffered a 26% decline in shipments of recorded music and a 14% drop in revenue since 1999 - the year online services such as Napster started, allowing music fans to swap copyrighted music over the internet.

But critics of the music industry say it has to shoulder some of the blame for the downturn, saying it has failed to nurture new talent to generate interest and sales. The slump in sales has forced companies to look at mergers as a way of surviving.

Time Warner's Warner Music, Bertelsmann's BMG, and EMI - have all discussed possible merger combinations. But Universal Music, which controls about 30% of the US music market and 25% of the global market, has effectively ruled itself out of any merger talks.

Meanwhile, the recording industry has gone on the offensive against internet piracy by filing lawsuits against people who allegedly share music illegally online in the hope of scaring users from file-sharing services such as Kazaa.

Universal executives said 190 of the people affected by the cuts are in North America, with the rest coming from Universal operations around the world. No details have been given about which units or departments will be hit. In recent months, Universal outsourced its CD distribution operation in Italy, and in the Philippines it has outsourced its sales function, reducing its staff in the country from 160 people to 30.
[/font]
 
FM104 just ran a bit on the 7 o'clock news about this - the Universal Music Dublin man said it was down to people "shoplifting" music off the internet.

Of course it is.
 
pete said:
FM104 just ran a bit on the 7 o'clock news about this - the Universal Music Dublin man said it was down to people "shoplifting" music off the internet.

Of course it is.
Yeah, the head of Universal france was on T.V. last night whining about how they can't lower the price of cd's over here because it "would hurt the artists" and that was why they were going to campaign for a reduction in VAT on cds. That way "both the consumer and the artist win and nobody loses"

Soulseek.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Activity
So far there's no one here
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

21 Day Calendar

Landless: 'Lúireach' Album Launch (Glitterbeat Records)
The Unitarian Church, Stephen's Green
Dublin Unitarian Church, 112 St Stephen's Green, Dublin, D02 YP23, Ireland

Support thumped.com

Support thumped.com and upgrade your account

Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...

Upgrade now

Latest Activity

Loading…
Back
Top