Random Photos (5 Viewers)

[hugh]

This is amazing!

Yeah, incredible colours. Where was dat taken then?

 

[hugh]

 

[hugh]

 

[Kid Lovebeach]

Yeah, incredible colours. Where was dat taken then?

taken in Phi Phi, Thailand, last november, on a simple olympus digital, no photoshop messing except a bit of cropping.
in fairness tho, it'd be pretty hard not to get a good shot with that scenery.

 

[La La]

is this film? either way, i love it. sunbleached.

 

[maims bond]

 

[hugh]

is this film? either way, i love it. sunbleached.

Cheers. It is film, yeah. Tmax I think. Scanned from a negative .. haven't made a print of it yet but may do so tomorrow ....

 

[Janer]

 

[La La]

so today i picked up the film scanner johnnyraz had advertised.

i fear i'll never leave the house again.

 

[magicbastarder]

in terms of film scanning, beware of neopan processed in gunns - they use rodinal developer, which gives very contrasty results with neopan film, and my scanner sometimes can't cope with the contrast.

 

[La La]

in terms of film scanning, beware of neopan processed in gunns - they use rodinal developer, which gives very contrasty results with neopan film, and my scanner sometimes can't cope with the contrast.

i have two rolls of neopan processed by them. in some shots i thought the contrast looked deadly, in others, a little muddy. it's all still a learning thing for me though, so im just delighted if i can get a print from them at all

(that said, i already prefer the results i get from ilford film)

 

[magicbastarder]

delta 3200 is only deadly for portraits. great in low light, flattering skin tones, forgiving on focus, and the grain is fantastic.

 

[Janer]

 

[sarah]

That hour or so last night when the sky kinda cleared up, and I pitied all those people from countries with clear blue skies and no clouds.

 

[La La]

in terms of film scanning, beware of neopan processed in gunns - they use rodinal developer, which gives very contrasty results with neopan film, and my scanner sometimes can't cope with the contrast.

i just discovered this to be true. the neopan film looks shit in teh scanner. the contrast is all over the place!

 

[Anarcho Munk]

 

[hugh]

i just discovered this to be true. the neopan film looks shit in teh scanner. the contrast is all over the place!

Just checked the last few I posted up. Both the tree one and the fence-post in the field are Neopan processed in Gunns. Both look pretty good to me though there is a lot of contrast there ......

Just got a roll of SFX200 back and it looks disastrous.

Tmax always seems to come out well though ... see below

 

[potlatch]

Yes, I'm a bad, bad person.

 

[broken arm]

 

[PING PONG]

this is what each crawford student sees every day