stephenoblunt
Guest
What is this? Beadle's About?? I'm sorry but your post hasn't swayed me..
" This is amazing. Could you tell us about bisexuals and transsexuals now? What are their animal avatars? "
Easy. Bisexuals don't exist. I don't care what you have to say about this, I'm in fourth year in psychology so I know what I'm talking about here. It's a condition where people aren't properly capable of repressing homosexual sentiments/desires and only half do the job. So in effect what you have is a gross mish mash of gay/straight. Not gross as in wrong, but gross as in confused. Transsexuals are even more odd! They really don't know what's going on and I don't know any so I'm not share whehter they are attracted to looks or personality.
"Also, I saw a lady with very short hair sleeping upside down from a tree branch, but later I saw her tonguing a male peacock. I'm confused. What did I just see? Is it because lesbians have really bad eyesight? Then, later, I saw this hawk flying in circles and then it swooped down and picked up this total minger who was squaqwking, "SHOW ME YOUR HAWK COCK!" If I thought I was confused before, you didn't know the half."
Here that poke at my animal analogy doesn't prove it wrong. In fact, in a way it sort of re-enforces it! You've just admitted how confused you are when it comes to sexuality! If you can't translate it into a simple analogy using hawks/bats/peacocks, how can you understand the complex goings on of a gay mind?
"Could you explain, then, why women have eyes AT ALL? "
Yeah - for visuality. To see what men do. To watch them behave. To be attracted to what they do.
"When my mind stopped boggling, I realised that I think this is a much more negative statement about men than about women, that it suggests that men are really shallow, that they can only really admire and desire a woman who has shown him her tits, and that they think so little of women as human beings that women who look physically similar might as well be the same person, even if our personalities differ. Maybe I'm just lucky, but I don't really know any men who are that shallow."
Well, I'm afraid you're just going to have to accept it.This is what lads are like. Yes, even your friends. Another thing we have learned from psychology. The only reason lads pretend to be sensitive and deep is because they are dying to have sex with girls. Girls wear make up to enhance how they look to attract guys, guys pretend to be deep and sensitive to attract girls. Both sexes guess it's what the other wants. Any time a guy enjoys deep conversation is usually with one of his mates (guys) because they can understand mroe abstract notions. I'm not going to get into it here because I know you'll flip, but guys are far better at understanding complex abstract notions, hence far more male philosophers/psychologists. Also hence Freud's genius.
"Really"
Yes really, any girls who like that sort of stuff are few and far between.
And I didn't learn anything from Nuts magazine. I got all my knowledge from Freud, Rogers, Maslow, Thorndike, Pavlov, Bander, Kagan, Jung and a whole ream of other brilliant minds.
" This is amazing. Could you tell us about bisexuals and transsexuals now? What are their animal avatars? "
Easy. Bisexuals don't exist. I don't care what you have to say about this, I'm in fourth year in psychology so I know what I'm talking about here. It's a condition where people aren't properly capable of repressing homosexual sentiments/desires and only half do the job. So in effect what you have is a gross mish mash of gay/straight. Not gross as in wrong, but gross as in confused. Transsexuals are even more odd! They really don't know what's going on and I don't know any so I'm not share whehter they are attracted to looks or personality.
"Also, I saw a lady with very short hair sleeping upside down from a tree branch, but later I saw her tonguing a male peacock. I'm confused. What did I just see? Is it because lesbians have really bad eyesight? Then, later, I saw this hawk flying in circles and then it swooped down and picked up this total minger who was squaqwking, "SHOW ME YOUR HAWK COCK!" If I thought I was confused before, you didn't know the half."
Here that poke at my animal analogy doesn't prove it wrong. In fact, in a way it sort of re-enforces it! You've just admitted how confused you are when it comes to sexuality! If you can't translate it into a simple analogy using hawks/bats/peacocks, how can you understand the complex goings on of a gay mind?
"Could you explain, then, why women have eyes AT ALL? "
Yeah - for visuality. To see what men do. To watch them behave. To be attracted to what they do.
"When my mind stopped boggling, I realised that I think this is a much more negative statement about men than about women, that it suggests that men are really shallow, that they can only really admire and desire a woman who has shown him her tits, and that they think so little of women as human beings that women who look physically similar might as well be the same person, even if our personalities differ. Maybe I'm just lucky, but I don't really know any men who are that shallow."
Well, I'm afraid you're just going to have to accept it.This is what lads are like. Yes, even your friends. Another thing we have learned from psychology. The only reason lads pretend to be sensitive and deep is because they are dying to have sex with girls. Girls wear make up to enhance how they look to attract guys, guys pretend to be deep and sensitive to attract girls. Both sexes guess it's what the other wants. Any time a guy enjoys deep conversation is usually with one of his mates (guys) because they can understand mroe abstract notions. I'm not going to get into it here because I know you'll flip, but guys are far better at understanding complex abstract notions, hence far more male philosophers/psychologists. Also hence Freud's genius.
"Really"
Yes really, any girls who like that sort of stuff are few and far between.
And I didn't learn anything from Nuts magazine. I got all my knowledge from Freud, Rogers, Maslow, Thorndike, Pavlov, Bander, Kagan, Jung and a whole ream of other brilliant minds.
