if we measure success solely in numbers of deaths (and there's a strong justification for doing so), then it was, yes, but I'd rather be where we are now than to be where they are. Them and Australia both. I just wonder what other, untold, harm their approach as done to people there.Do you think it was bad?
They probably should have developed their own vaccine since they're a rich country at the end of the vaccine queue and every method is eventually herd immunity but otherwise, yes?