Eurovision cancelled.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Didn't this come from wild animals? Most likely bats, possibly via pangolins is what I heard
Yeah of course, we all do. The Shock Doctrine works for a reason. I remain hopeful myself.Meh. I've enough to be fucking worrying about, thank you very much
My mate has been told 4 to 5 days for a test. Okay we're doing better than the UK and the US but they're perhaps not the best benchmark.One of my friends' partner is a pharmacist, they've tested a colleague of her's this morning.
Sort of, yeah.My understanding of herd immunity is that you have to either a) have a vaccine or b) have evidence that people who get the disease can't contract it again.
Have they got either of those? Or are they banking on b being very likely? Hell, you have to put your trust somewhere.
yeah, that's right. There's different strains of 'flu or cold or Ebola or whatever.Well how do people keep getting the cold and flu over and over again? I think the answer is that different strains are continually emerging but, if so, is something similar not possible here?
So precisely because this virus is a coronavirus it is very unlikely to mutate in a way that human immune systems cannot recognize it? How unlikely, like if this 'herd immunity' approach were to allow the disease to become extremely widespread does it not leave open this possibility just a little bit? Would that be another point against that approach (apart from the heartless modelling of an acceptable number of deaths).yeah, that's right. There's different strains of 'flu or cold or Ebola or whatever.
There's two sources of viruses: Other humans or animals. For common cold say, there's an existing virus in the human population, infecting people and moving from host to host. Once you catch that specific strain you generate a special type of cell that memorizes some trait of the infectious agent, and you clear that virus. You don't catch that version of the virus again. If the virus stays in the human population the special trait previously recognized and previously used to define the virus as foreign can change. This "successful" mutation typically takes longer periods of time, usually something on the order of a year let's say.
Then there's the other source, animal. That's where this lad came from. It's really unlikely that animal / human jumps occur. For that to happen twice is really_unlikely squared unlikely. IE really really really unlikely. So, you can be fairly sure there was only one occurrence of the virus jumping from animal to human.
So precisely because this virus is a coronavirus it is very unlikely to mutate in a way that human immune systems cannot recognize it? How unlikely, like if this 'herd immunity' approach were to allow the disease to become extremely widespread does it not leave open this possibility just a little bit? Would that be another point against that approach (apart from the heartless modelling of an acceptable number of deaths).
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.