I wonder are those parts of the constitution "non justicable"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ye are all just making this waaaaay more confusing for my little brain
Can you give us a few links?ann post said:B: people i know who are great at law who have disabilities returning to online life entirely to try and make the argument for people with disabilities
I wonder are those parts of the constitution "non justicable"
I absolutely have not, and that's an unfair thing to say. I've spent a big chunk of my day trying to figure out how I should vote in the care amendment.you've spent the day doing is try and deconstruct the idea that a disabled person might want to live outside a house in which an unpaid carer is their source of sustenance
I absolutely have not, and that's an unfair thing to say. I've spent a big chunk of my day trying to figure out how I should vote in the care amendment.
I will endeavour to make it more straightforward, you should strive to understand betterYe are all just making this waaaaay more confusing for my little brain
Yes I am sure. I just can't see see how removing a (false) constitutional promise that women won't be forced by economic necessity to work outside the home has implications for people with disabilities. If it does then how?
You've posted a single real life example about the child of a friend, in which you claim the amendment creates legal doubt about the kid's entitlement to support. I'm not ignoring you, I just (as I said) don't see the connection. Afaics the kid has no constitutional right to support NOW (only the child's mother has) and the amendment doesn't change that
I'm not trying to corner you, I'm trying to find a solid reason to vote no
From the FLAC website from last December:I just can't see see how removing a (false) constitutional promise that women won't be forced by economic necessity to work outside the home has implications for people with disabilities. If it does then how?
And if you’re pondering now over the meaning of endeavour or strive in terms of obligation, just think how satisfied you’ll be to find out exactly what a judge thinks the meaning is in a few years after some family take the government to court for a long, expensive battle to justify their existence and need for care?
Unfortunately there's no option for "No, try again". Just "No".
There is. It’s called contacting your TD, supporting disability advocates, and voting for candidates who recognise that this is an issue. And letting those who don’t make it an issue know that’s why you’re not voting for them.Unfortunately there's no option for "No, try again". Just "No".
By friday?There is. It’s called contacting your TD, supporting disability advocates, and voting for candidates who recognise that this is an issue. And letting those who don’t make it an issue know that’s why you’re not voting for them.
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.