Real Life People I have the Horn For (1 Viewer)

[BC]

4-chan esque, I dunno about that.. I don't see how people get pissed off with stuff on an internet forum (I guess if they're at work, but then maybe it's just because they're worried about getting caught, in which case they probably shouldn't be looking at message boards...)
I think the Thumped message board would have a very long way to fall if people wanted it to reach the depths of 4 chan type tomfoolery...

all i'm saying is that i really have no time explicit, ugly, crass vulgarity. i don't want to see that shit on here.

the 4 chan reference is more to do with the trend of certain users towards being as inconsiderate towards others as possible in order to give themselves a cheap lazy laugh.

 

[D0njo]

Fair enough, sometimes I find cheap laughs to be more than the sum of their vulgar parts though*, something to do with using the vast resource that is the internet purely to make stupid crude jokes that repeat themselves endlessly, each to their internet own though











*or think I?

 

[nooleen]

it means he fancies women. So basically, it was a cunty way of saying he is a straight man.

but technically it would make him a male-to-female unoperated transsexual, although heterosexual.

that crack certainly backfired on HIM, ho ho

 

[Pantone247]

it makes him K.D. Lang

duh!

 

[Cormcolash]

all i'm saying is that i really have no time explicit, ugly, crass vulgarity. i don't want to see that shit on here.

Yeah, so in that case don't look at threads titled "I have the horn for" etc. etc. etc.
And if you mean that you don't want to see those threads on here, then that's fair enough too. These kind of threads are simply a crass way of objectifying people and celebrities, justified by the fact that "other people are looking at it too" or something like that.
At the same time, they don't particularly bother me, as I get much amusement from eg. Johnny Stress photoshops and the like, which invariably pop up.
The threads have plus sides and negative sides from whatever point of view you want to see it. The argument of "people in work might see that" is equally as valid as the counter-argument of "well what are you doing looking at one of these threads in work?"
The thread title says it all. If you look at one of these threads, you are potentially going to be looking at pictures of semi-naked women etc., which certainly isn't appropriate for a working environment no matter what extent it is taken to.
It's the same as going to look at a Dogging in Mullingar thread, or Irish Porn thread, and assuming that you are not going to see dodgy stuff.
If you're okay with threads like this existing here, then you shouldn't be surprised if they contain inappropriate content for a workplace. You should know better than to look at them in work.
Personally, I think that these threads shouldn't be on Thumped cause it's not that sort of forum in general, aside from the odd bit of joking about. But end of the day Pete's the guy that runs the thing so what he wants is the law.

 

[Love Saves The Day]

Yeah, so in that case don't look at threads titled "I have the horn for" etc. etc. etc.
And if you mean that you don't want to see those threads on here, then that's fair enough too. These kind of threads are simply a crass way of objectifying people and celebrities, justified by the fact that "other people are looking at it too" or something like that.
At the same time, they don't particularly bother me, as I get much amusement from eg. Johnny Stress photoshops and the like, which invariably pop up.
The threads have plus sides and negative sides from whatever point of view you want to see it. The argument of "people in work might see that" is equally as valid as the counter-argument of "well what are you doing looking at one of these threads in work?"
The thread title says it all. If you look at one of these threads, you are potentially going to be looking at pictures of semi-naked women etc., which certainly isn't appropriate for a working environment no matter what extent it is taken to.
It's the same as going to look at a Dogging in Mullingar thread, or Irish Porn thread, and assuming that you are not going to see dodgy stuff.
If you're okay with threads like this existing here, then you shouldn't be surprised if they contain inappropriate content for a workplace. You should know better than to look at them in work.
Personally, I think that these threads shouldn't be on Thumped cause it's not that sort of forum in general, aside from the odd bit of joking about. But end of the day Pete's the guy that runs the thing so what he wants is the law.

Weren't you posting pictures of cocks a couple of days ago?

If so, that makes that post pretty funny

 

[Cormcolash]

The only contribution I have made to any of these threads is to try and ruin them by posting pictures of cocks.
Seems to have worked here.

Edit: It was fairly amusing too

 

[jonah]

Hm maybe putting 'NSFW' in the thread title would solve the discrepency.

 

[Love Saves The Day]

The only contribution I have made to any of these threads is to try and ruin them by posting pictures of cocks.
Seems to have worked here.

Edit: It was fairly amusing too

Is that like when people throw paint on fur coats?

Anarchy!

 

[Cormcolash]

Fairly punk alright

 

[nooleen]

more like spunking on a hipster's mohair jumper

 

[BC]

Yeah, so in that case don't look at threads titled "I have the horn for" etc. etc. etc.
And if you mean that you don't want to see those threads on here, then that's fair enough too. These kind of threads are simply a crass way of objectifying people and celebrities, justified by the fact that "other people are looking at it too" or something like that.
At the same time, they don't particularly bother me, as I get much amusement from eg. Johnny Stress photoshops and the like, which invariably pop up.
The threads have plus sides and negative sides from whatever point of view you want to see it. The argument of "people in work might see that" is equally as valid as the counter-argument of "well what are you doing looking at one of these threads in work?"
The thread title says it all. If you look at one of these threads, you are potentially going to be looking at pictures of semi-naked women etc., which certainly isn't appropriate for a working environment no matter what extent it is taken to.
It's the same as going to look at a Dogging in Mullingar thread, or Irish Porn thread, and assuming that you are not going to see dodgy stuff.
If you're okay with threads like this existing here, then you shouldn't be surprised if they contain inappropriate content for a workplace. You should know better than to look at them in work.
Personally, I think that these threads shouldn't be on Thumped cause it's not that sort of forum in general, aside from the odd bit of joking about. But end of the day Pete's the guy that runs the thing so what he wants is the law.

wow, given that you have been one of the most consistently tiresome, inconsiderate and obnoxious posters on here lately, seeing you trying to be self-rightious is remarkably unconvincing.

 

[snakybus]

Hey, didn't nooly post a load of pictures of soldiers with their lads out - they had stiffys and all. Why was nobody in uproar about that? Not that they should. It only heightened my respect for her. It was funny too the way all the soldiers had really small willies.

Also, what this "get in trouble at work" thing. What are you, teenagers at school? Take some responsibility, people.

 

[Squiggle]

User CP > Edit Ignore List

 

[David Kronenbourg]

there's no comparing what is posted in the horn thread to a close up pic of a cock. there's nothing more graphic in the horn thread than what you'd see in a tabloid newspaper lying around any office canteen. any company i've worked for allows a certain amount of internet surfing per day during your downtime but looking at pornographic images is a sackable offence

 

[Pantone247]

Fairly punk alright

PUNK COCK!!!

 

[SONYMEGADRIVE]

what about pictures of penises that are hosted on wikipedia?



educational use

 

[therealjohnny]

Yeah, so in that case don't look at threads titled "I have the horn for" etc. etc. etc.
And if you mean that you don't want to see those threads on here, then that's fair enough too. These kind of threads are simply a crass way of objectifying people and celebrities, justified by the fact that "other people are looking at it too" or something like that.
At the same time, they don't particularly bother me, as I get much amusement from eg. Johnny Stress photoshops and the like, which invariably pop up.

hey hey! leave me out of it man! I don't want to be associated with the latest pariah

(In true biblical style, when the cock crows three times I'll realise what I've done and be full of remorse- but "cock" is a bad word around here of late)

And I resent the insinuation that I'm some sort of predictable one-trick pony internet annoyance


... on the other hand

 

[Cormcolash]

wow, given that you have been one of the most consistently tiresome, inconsiderate and obnoxious posters on here lately, seeing you trying to be self-rightious is remarkably unconvincing.

If you can't laugh at things on the internet, you probably shouldn't be using the internet.
There have been numerous people in the past on Thumped (and still are to a certain extent) who think it's okay to try and bully less prolific users based on their own inflated sense of worth. Your statement above is fairly typical of that kind of thing.

 

[SONYMEGADRIVE]

shit - too late for me to edit my post. apologises for the big
penis. i was just messin. if a moderator could edit that, i would
be very greatful.

anyway - i've already gone over how i feel about this kind of thing
in depth on another thread, so no point rehashing everything here:

http://www.thumped.com/bbs/showpost.php?p=722021&postcount=28