Buzzo
Well-Known Member
i'm so, so relieved to hear that she can travel
Me too. On so many levels. Thank fuckin christ.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i'm so, so relieved to hear that she can travel
You sound as if ur petrified to be labelled pro life.......Dont get me wrong.... I am totally in favour of pro-choice. I just heard an argument on the radio about this case from a pyschologist saying perhaps if she did see her baby die it could be less traumatic than abortion which for some women can be even more painful. It seemed to make sense to me when I heard it.
Me too. On so many levels. Thank fuckin christ.
...it was no harm for the judges to have the extra couple of days.
So if a woman is not raped or has a problem pregnancy where do you stand we say on a normal pregnancy?I'm going to defend Choice Ireland's statement.
In the interests of full disclosure - I am a member of Choice Ireland.
While it sounds callous she's going to have a fair few bad days and while it may be ok this time if there is just straight forward agreement for types of abortion it would become the norm which i-m-o would be wrong.i think it could have been avoided, those extra couple of days are something with which Miss D could have done without. fuckin terrible.
i dont think any of it could become the norm. im just annoyed that something so obvious could take more than one day. dunno whether its money-hungry lawyers, stubborn HSE or beaurocratic courts but it should have been dealt with better i-m-o.While it sounds callous she's going to have a fair few bad days and while it may be ok this time if there is just straight forward agreement for types of abortion it would become the norm which i-m-o would be wrong.
It is legal council's responsibility to argue as strongly as possible for their client and from my limited understanding that could be a compelling argument from a purely legal standpoint, if constitutionally the right to life of the unborn is protected then how far does it extend within the current framework? I also believe that in the decision that point wasn't even looked at because the judge said that the main thing to be decided on was the freedom to travel issue and once he'd sided against the HSE then he was able to sidestep Connolly's point so it's still up in the air.
As for the letters to the times. Sometimes it's better to let idiots hang themselves with their own words.
You sound as if ur petrified to be labelled pro life.......
I'm pro life and I haven't being bumped off yet.
This case was diff ok and even had me not sure what was best so as someone else said earlier it was no harm for the judges to have the extra couple of days.
I
They confronted members of the pro-choice campaign by sticking video cameras in their faces, and when the the pro-choice people reacted by pushing the cameras away, the pro-life people accused them of assault. They cheered when cars passed by them on the quays beeping their horns.
Cheers.
who cheered?
So if a woman is not raped or has a problem pregnancy where do you stand we say on a normal pregnancy?
and I don't want any links but just a reply....
Did anyone get those pro-lifer christmas cards through their door?
Disagree 100% on everything.A woman's body is entirely her own and nobody else's. Her rights should take precedence over the rights of the unborn. A woman should have the right to decide whether she wishes to have a child or not and should not be dictated to by constitutional law. If she wishes for an abortion, then she should be entitled to have one in Ireland.
I hope that answers your question.
FWIW, did you look at the link in my original post?
Abortions for some, Miniature American flags for others.
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.