No.this is actually quite complex but are you then suggesting that a society that doesn't value or encourage creativity is better off (in all respects)? or that creativity just has no intrinsic value?
I think that a society that encourages creativity may be economically more competitive, but that's likely to be the only societal benefit - encouraging creativity alone, without making other more fundamental changes to How Things Work, won't make people happier or more fulfilled. That's not to say that a society that encourages creativity will be worse off, just that it's unlikely to make any difference
I think creativity does have intrinsic value, but you can't argue for or against something based on its intrinsic value, can you? That's a purely subjective emotional judgement, surely?
That's what I think he might be trying to say, but his point (if he has one) is so obscured by anecdotes that it seems we on this thread can't agree what it isbut above you suggested he is saying that "creativity skills will somehow make society better off, with happier and more fulfilled citizens" that's a pretty coherent summation of a complex set of issues.