Janer
Well-Known Member
You don't say that when you take my money !bogweeler said:Janer, shut the fuck up you dodgey cunt.
.|..|
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don't say that when you take my money !bogweeler said:Janer, shut the fuck up you dodgey cunt.
.|..|
Anarcho Munk said:I'm sure Janer does
Oh yes it can and oh yes there is.Jaysus' Jisim said:Free speech by it's very definition cannot have a line drawn. If that happens, there is not free speech.
Absolute free speech: Just what the name implies. Free speech is an
absolute right, not merely the most important right. When the U.S.
Constitution says that Congress shall enact "no law" against free
speech, that means "no law." Under this theory, anything goes:
pornography, slander, libel, invasion of privacy, incitement to commit
crime, talking to members of a jury during a break in a trial, and so
on.
Balanced free speech: In this approach, the desirability of free
speech is judged against other needs of society. Under this approach,
it might be OK to outlaw pornography, for example, because doing so
upholds morality and prevents exploitation. It might be also be OK
under this theory to make it illegal to criticize the President at a
time of war because it would embolden our enemies. With this
approach, free speech is far from absolute, and it is no more or less
important than other values.
Preferred position: This is the position that is most often used to
decide court cases in the United States. Free speech is seen as an
important, even vital, right but not the only right. Where there are
other rights involved, it is presumed that free speech will rule
unless curtailing free speech is the only way to prevent some sort of
grievous harm or abridgment of other rights. Under this kind of
reasoning, as an example, it makes more sense to lock up jurors during
a trial than to prevent public commentary on the trial. Or we would
allow almost any type of political speech as long as that speech
doesn't directly urge commission of a crime.
What's clearly not what you said?Jaysus' Jisim said:That's clearly not what I said, as I'm sure you were aware, Eoddy.
I am quite disappointed that people from these "Punk boards" would listen to anything else besides Punk tbh.Alan Remorse said:do you really think people here listen to nothing other than punk?
.....JANER said:I am quite disappointed that people from these "Punk boards" would listen to anything else besides Punk
JANER said:No its fucking not, this is a Punk board, you want to talk about these multi million selling "great" indie bands go here and talk to your hears desires
http://www.arcticmonkeys.com/
JANER said:Maybe when you hit 16 it will all become crystal clear ;]
What would be really funny would be me banning your account right now.Jaysus' Jisim said:Incorrect Pete. If you don't support free speech, fine, but don't pretend you do if you don't.
But........he's not talking about them here....and who mentioned multi million selling indie bands?...JANER said:No its fucking not, this is a Punk board, you want to talk about these multi million selling "great" indie bands go here and talk to your hears desires
http://www.arcticmonkeys.com/
Today I had to put up with Rory Gallagher on these threadsEoddy Gorilla said:But........he's not talking about them here....and who mentioned multi million selling indie bands?...
Just cos yer on a punk board doesn't mean thats all ya can fuckin' listen to, Jaysus..fair enough if everyones goin' on about "great" indie bands all the time here, but they're not..
I guess the only valid point ya made was in that Alan *loves* Arctic Monkeys.
Are ya serious? Ya poor thing.JANER said:Today I had to put up with Rory Gallagher on these threads
Wouldn't have really thought so meself. A band saying something you simply don't agree with is different than a band having fascistic leanings.Jaysus' Jisim said:Pete, A band that you (wrongly as it happens) percieve as having a message that you don't agree with is no concern of yours. I don't like the subject matter of Cannibal Corpse for instance, but I'm not interested in having their gigs pulled. I just don't go to them.
If a punk band sang about things I didn't agree with, I obviously wouldn't go to see them. But I wouldn't be going anyway, as i've got about as much interest in punk as I do in Shaken Stevens.
That's the bottom line here.
Bollocks.Jaysus' Jisim said:Pete, A band that you (wrongly as it happens) percieve as having a message that you don't agree with is no concern of yours.
I was born and raised in Germany and like to pride myself in a certain level of freedom people enjoy there. I have to wonder, however, whatever the hell has been going on recently in that the Germans are very quick to censor and boycott bands and ban them from performing their art. What was your reaction when you had become a target of this censorship for one of your albums?
Gelal: There's freedom in Germany to film and produce fist-fucking films, walk around in bondage at the queer LoveParade in Berlin every year, and open up your own Pakistani restaurant! I dont know what freedom you're talking about. Not much else. Ask Landser, Absurd, and Rock-o-Rama Records what they think about German freedom.
And so, because he doesn't explicitly refer to the scourge of pakistani restaurants in Germany, or the many good works of Ian Stuart when writing the lyrics for GBK, then that's alright?Grand Belial's Key, the fathers of U.S. Black metal, has made a mark in the metal scene. How do you see yourself as a role model to many young people who listen to and who get into your music?
Gelal: I have no role models in metal. I hope that no one is as delusional as that and believes in musical role models other than in individuals such as Ian Stuart, for example. Real role models should be arsonists and suicide bombers.
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.