nooleen
bad ape
In an organisation with 20,000+ employees?
6 out of a couple of hundred presenters..as a few examples
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In an organisation with 20,000+ employees?
2-3%? As evidence of a wider practice?6 out of a couple of hundred presenters..as a few examples
When he says "if not outright nepotism" his meaning is "it's basically nepotism". It's why he uses the word nepotism. He wants you to regard it as such.
His meaning is certainly not "A family introduction is not nepotism.". It is essentially the opposite of that.
if not outright nepotism, certainly a family introduction seems to advance careers,
Noyour question was why is nepotism bad, and should we ban it
It is essentially a claim that a family introduction seems to advance careers, which suggests nepotism.
It matters because your original question:
Do they tie the anecdotal examples of nepotism to concrete examples of how it fails the Corporation?
is asking for some kind of technical proof of a suggestion, which is not required.
So, to answer, no they don't have concrete examples of how nepotism fails the corporation because they are not making a concrete claim about nepotism. They are making an anecdotal claim which, along with all the other claims, suggests a certain behavior in the BBC.
Ok, well then you'll be happy to know that at no point does this article claim that nepotism is widely practiced in the BBC.
Yeah, "anecdotal claim" was a bad use of phrase on my side.These things seem to contradict each other.
He's either claiming it or he's not (he is)
oh, coolNo
I get that nepotism can be a bad thing.
I just don't think that it's the same as hiring of relatives, which is often a good thingoh, cool
cos everything you previously posted gave the opposite impression
phew
I guess the issue here is that it's a publicly-owned organization, not a family owned one. No?I just don't think that it's the same as hiring of relatives, which is often a good thing
No one else seems to have that impression, or make that distinction
If someone grows up in a family of professionals that work in an organisation, and is exposed to the culture of that organisation and the day-to-day requirements of that profession, and have a someone within the organisation to act as a mentor, then I think that is a whole pile of positives. All other things being equal, the issue of a good fit is rendered null.I guess the issue here is that it's a publicly-owned organization, not a family owned one. No?
Theres a "Best boy for the job" joke in there somewhere.If someone grows up in a family of professionals that work in an organisation, and is exposed to the culture of that organisation and the day-to-day requirements of that profession, and have a someone within the organisation to act as a mentor, then I think that is a whole pile of positives. All other things being equal, the issue of a good fit is rendered null.
I'm thinking mainly in the private sector. The example in my head is architecture.
But i'd have to think that if you're hiring key grips for your TV show and someone is the daughter of key grips and has been yapping and reading about key gripping since she was young, and her Dad is around to be a key grip mentor, then I think you grab that hire. If all you're doing is hiring people's daughters and sons for every position though, then you've got an obvious problem.
I have no idea what a key grip is.
i find all this corruption very hard to believe
are you sure they weren't just the best-qualified of all possible candidates?
i wouldn'tI would give politicians some leeway
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.