Search results for query: *

Aye I get what you are saying. Adults gonna adult and all. But also like the thought of going out with someone who's offset by more than a generation is kinda mad - what the fuck would you be chattin baout like. Taylor swift ERA's tour meets 'well there was this guy called kurt cobain who...

Did the spreadsheet for Switzerland So now it's official About 200km with a break in the middle

Work just asked me to work at 06:00 tomorrow. "I thought maybe since you're Irish, you might do it because no one else wants to". That's pretty shit reasoning considering that what is now my main work, the other job, involves watching big sports things on TV, even engerland. And that work...

I dunno, we may not approve but these people are living different lives. This lady is some up & coming Youtuber or whatever, not some inegnue out of her depth. Maguire is a notably horrible person, but everything is seemingly consensual here. He's not her boss, she's not a dope. I would...

Economist ranking the richest countries in the world They can't include Ireland cos our GDP and GNI is so fucked up with our multi-national deals, it is literally impossible to calculate to a meaningful degree https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2024/07/04/the-worlds-richest-countries-in-2024

I would like to think so too But I think the Unionists are becoming even more hardline - fear of extinction BUt I am not a Nordie

Ok, given you’ve used a cloud pun about the weather, I’ll give you your last word.

in case where the total is 100% and that was the context, 3% drop does need to be balanced by 3% somewhere else. It did add up, ye's just didn't like it or somehting I brough the weather into to try and show ye's how nebulous ye's have gone on it.

Correct, it is maths to say there is a different value. It was the “the numbers are different and therefore this reason because maths” that was the part that didn’t add up. Statistics are not an abstract truth, context is everything and coincidences are common - a 3% drop in one does not infer...

I can't find a furter source for this beyond tweets

Wordle 1,113 4/6 ⬛⬛⬛⬛🟨 🟩🟩⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

The usual example given would be mid overtake, and something unexpected happens which leaves you with the choice of abandoning the manoeuvre, or accelerating to complete it. This *can* happen, but so rarely it'd barely make a dent in the argument I think.

I know there probably isn't a way to talk sense into that. If such a fringe case actually happened, you'd be putting yourself in the legally responsible bracket by breaking the speed limit. But look it i grew up in boy racer land. It's really hard to argue against 6-10 billion euro of global...

An Irishman walks up to a building site looking for a job. The foreman says "alright paddy, I'll give you a job if you can tell me the difference between 'joist' and 'girder'." The Irish man says "that's easy, Joist wrote Ulysses and Girder wrote Faust"

I've debated it on boards. The usual complaint is 'sometimes I need to accelerate beyond the limit to avoid a potential hazard' and it does strike me like that special pleading of 'sometimes wearing a seatbelt makes you more likely to be injured' you occasionally hear.

I'm sure this'll have the jeremy clarksons of the world whinging for months - I'd possibly like the tech to go a bit further - limited speed and limited miles per gallon. The idea that a few lines of code could be 5% drop in transport emmissions across Europe is not to be ignored.

...once you hit a certain number of years - I don't think Gaiman is ever going to justify that stuff to be honest. half your age plus seven like....* I think maybe it might be closer to JK rowling 2.0 - people have a very close relationship with the books and they don't immediately want to live...