Search results for query: *

Calvary Brendan Gleeson and Kelly Reilly are great Everyone else can fuck off and die. Stupid small town wierdos hilbilly porn Woefully overrated.

X Men Days of Future Past. Grand Everything set in the future looked like the start of T2 if it were directed by M Knight Shamaladingdong So I disliked that. One would have though that superhero costumes wouldn't be a priority in a distopian future!

Jeysus though, That woman is a fucking headwreck. It's a character that's 50% Bruce Willis girlfriend in Pulp Fiction and 50% Jane's twitter feed.

There's a joke to be made about the Jolie-Pitts and snatching little kids out of Africa that I'm not crass enough to make. No double it'll be on South Park ... and funnier than anything I could come up with.

47 Ronin. Mostly very very good, tells its story patiently and with care. The 12A rating was a but odd - it looked to me like all of the suicide scenes had been cut after the fact to get a 12A, and that originally they had intended to be a bit harder, which would suit the overall tone of the...

The Hobbit. I made the mistake of seeing it in HFR...don't make the same mistake!

http://www.tcm.com/mediaroom/video/89728/Adam-s-Rib-Movie-Clip-You-Really-Meant-That-.html

You are all mean...she's lovely.

We are the Millers Intermittently funny, in a really stupid way. Not as shit as I expected it to be but no classic either. Someday Jennifer Aniston is going to star in the great comedy she deserves

No it's confusing allright. They changed the plot quite a bit. The mini series with Alec Guinness is on of the best things ever - I watch it at lease once a year.

The Wolverine: Pros - A pretty self contained story. Hairy man gets a Japanese bath and it's not all Sean Connery and sex touristy. The schoolgirls in short skirts and white socks with samurai swords masturbatory urge is dialed down a bit. The sequence on to of the bullet train is good. Cons -...

Pacific Rim Not entirely my cup of tea, but well made. Fight scenes were intelligible (I'm looking at you Michael bay) That lad from The Unit - does he ever play any other character than a soldier of some sort?

I enjoyed it. A bit more of the global stuff would have been good - North Korea for example - I'd have loved to have seen that It's a shame the last act was so small in scale compared to everything else - it was lake a well made made for tv episode tacked onto the end of a blockbuster.

Saw Both Superman and After Earth over the weekend. Superman, OK until the last 3rd, which is hellishly loud and annoying. What exactly was the point of the Roland Emmerich level of destruction? Trains get fucked about like toys and Metropolis is subjected to a dozen 9/11s in an afternoon...

So if it's faction then back to my original question - Why is it important that the terrorist pursued is named Osama Bin Laden. This argument that it's just fiction, so what if it's wrong really baffles me. You really see no distinction between Inglorious Basterds and The Longest Day? Or the...

Not according to the director or the writer. Which is the point of the two questions I asked above. Q: If it's a wide angle look at the things that happened after 911 then why must it be OBL as the target? A: Because it's a work of journalism written with the help of the people involved Q: So...

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/feb/07/disturbing-misleading-zero-dark-thirty/?pagination=false

I think are confusing two different things: Were people tortured while hunting for OBL and Did torture in any way lead to the capture of OBL The second question has been answered by the people involved (the people who Bogalow and Boles are constantly hinting gave them inside information) and...

Why is it important that it is OBL in the film? What not some un-named senior terrorist. And the answer that the director will give is that "well it's important to tell the truth about the hunt for OBL etc. etc. etc" Then ask yourself "If that is the case why show torture if torture had no role...