- Thread starter
- #21
the strange guy
I LOVE ALLAH YOUSE
They turned away foreign aid after the tsunami. They really don't have a choice now though.burma is in a permanent state of dictatorship. there is no simple way out of that, and it is at the moment a cold fact. the commandos won't work. but the disruption of their ability to maintain control and surveillance of the population will inevitably destabilize the state to some extent, possibly allowing revolutionary conditions to emerge.
i don't know what 'aid' exactly means here but it seems like it's not going to be mere financial capital, but real material support and possibly personnel - engineers, administrators - to help establish shelter and provide the basics needed for survival. again, the power of the state to guarantee the basic requirements for life is now greatly diminished, and they may be forced to admit international civil NGOs. this would further decrease their control over the population.
if they refuse to admit international actors then there's not much anyone can do about it. for all i know they're still in complete control.
but simply refusing to try to do anything about it isn't an option, morally or strategically.
well, you got a bit more out me than i'd initially imagined.
Given that most people who understand the situation in Burma have also had it beaten into them that they should boycott everything Burmese.
It's easy to do, a lot easier than boycotting Chinese goods anyway.
I can't imagine there'll be the same kind of donations made for this as there was for the tsunami.
It's not Christmas time for a start, the best time to part Westerners from their grubby cash with concentrated guilt.
People would be concerned that their cash is going towards starching a General's shirt rather than paying an aid-worker's food bill.