- Joined
- Nov 1, 2002
- Messages
- 38,299
- Solutions
- 3
It's clearly a Masonic sigil
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's clearly a Masonic sigil
As in blocked by the army or blocked by anti-Biden people?
Isn’t everything?It's clearly a Masonic sigil
Isn’t everything?
👁
Ha I was just thinking about that this morning. It was sent to someone i know in his Official Capacity a few years back and I’ll never forget the look on his face when he was trying to explain it.The Dublin Occult Grid The Use of Black Magic by Ireland's Ruling ... - [PDF Document]
The Dublin Occult Grid The Use of Black Magic by Irelandâs Ruling Elite Jeremy James Published by Zephaniah Press Copyright 2009 [email protected] 2 Table of Contents…fdocuments.in
Were they ever an actual band? I know yer man was a songwriter for hire and I always thought that ‘band’ was just a vehicle put together for him to release one of his own songs?They have renamed themselves the radical left new radicals....
New Radicals Reuniting After 22 Years to Perform at Biden Inauguration Event
The band returns for one day to perform “You Get What You Give” after Biden and Harris are sworn inpitchfork.com
The original NyTimes story is a good read if you have not read it already (in the Irish times also)
but also this thread. "The Vatican and 5 other huge key players" lol
I read some stat the other day about how people who actually believe in Q tend to be in their 20s but the older generation just believe all the Globalist Cabal Blood Drinkers bit but without Q.
the thing about it all, at least from my perspective, is how people are correct about a certain amount. It's how conspiracies work.I'd a 'discussion' with a person recently on the topic of rona. I mean I'm sure we all know someone like this but I was not capable of chasing down the core of what made the believe the rona was a giant mutlination conspiracy, they jumped from theory to theory to theory to theory continually - after a while i went with the tactic of asking them to give me the source of one bit of the theory, just one like one tiny strand of it. Obvs there was no source - there was 'I can do my own research and I don't need the media to make up my mind' (which i think possibly just means 'i saw some thing on youtube'). Anywhoo chasing one tiny strand and being unwavering in that chase eventually turned them completely ragey at me, which is fine, we all know I only feel a conversation is getting started when you've turned someone semi feral.
Anyways. There was no source, only rage, which is what i expected.
On reflection, I am currently convincing myself that I was essentially trying to debate a algorthym. the jumping from topic to topic, the concept that the answer to something was to talk about something else. You spend a few years observing that, you'll mimic it.
philosophically i keep coming back to this as my way of comprehending how these conclusions arise. What trump did was peddle simple solutions to complex problems - making himself the 'target' here.the thing about it all, at least from my perspective, is how people are correct about a certain amount. It's how conspiracies work.
and we import it all over here wholesale just like we did Gareth Brooks and cowboys in general.
Of course lean too heavily on that analogy and you end up guilty of it yourself.philosophically i keep coming back to this as my way of comprehending how these conclusions arise. What trump did was peddle simple solutions to complex problems - making himself the 'target' here.
I'd a 'discussion' with a person recently on the topic of rona. I mean I'm sure we all know someone like this but I was not capable of chasing down the core of what made the believe the rona was a giant mutlination conspiracy, they jumped from theory to theory to theory to theory continually - after a while i went with the tactic of asking them to give me the source of one bit of the theory, just one like one tiny strand of it. Obvs there was no source - there was 'I can do my own research and I don't need the media to make up my mind' (which i think possibly just means 'i saw some thing on youtube'). Anywhoo chasing one tiny strand and being unwavering in that chase eventually turned them completely ragey at me, which is fine, we all know I only feel a conversation is getting started when you've turned someone semi feral.
Anyways. There was no source, only rage, which is what i expected.
This is the factsOf course lean too heavily on that analogy and you end up guilty of it yourself.
I've an old friend who's gotten big into all these conspiracy theories over the last few years. I was getting into a habit of doom scrolling through her facebook feed over the last few weeks but had to stop because it was really starting to annoy me.
But there's been a timeline there. It started off with water charges protests.
From there she moved into anti government ranting
which then developed into anti big pharma
which then developed into chemtrail believe
and from there has gone to Scamdemic, #trump2020, fauci and bill gates created the virus which doesn't actually exist in a lab.
Anyways, like you said, there's no logic or coherence to the thought process. The only thing I'm really certain of is that she's a really fucking angry person. Why? I don't know.
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.