Two mehs already, have I hit on the 2023 jackpot of unpopular opinions??
I didn't really know what to make of it. It looked amazing and the acting was brilliant etc etc, but it didn't have much of an emotional effect on me ... which is probably for the best, I was afraid it'd depress the shit out of meThe Banshees of Inisherin is a good film.
I liked it too. Even though I'm not meant to I've later learned.I didn't really know what to make of it. It looked amazing and the acting was brilliant etc etc, but it didn't have much of an emotional effect on me ... which is probably for the best, I was afraid it'd depress the shit out of me
When did he claim that? I thought he'd at least have the decency to not reduce his own work to a terrible allegory that makes no sense.The point of the criticism (for me at least) is that MacDonagh claims that the two main characters are an allegory for the Irish civil war which reduces the civil war to a petty falling out between two friends when it's much more complex with very little pettiness.
When did he claim that? I thought he'd at least have the decency to not reduce his own work to a terrible allegory that makes no sense.
Terrible culture writers with no idea of history making their own leaps is not the same as McDonagh saying it's a parable.
But yeah, i take your point, it's the major thorn in the film all the same.
I have whole reading of the film I'll write out at some point about what it's "about" for me, and it's got nothing to do with any review I've seen, but the civil war aspect doesn't factor into it so i need to make some sense of that first.
Here's one that may not go down well ...
Have no time for landlords poor mouthing but in the absence of a revolution the nation is better off with people from here owning one, or a number of rental properties than a situation where Canadian hedge funds and Aussie banks own massive portfolios of housing stock here to the point where they're in a position to manipulate the prices in the market.
This is the story of Ireland post 2007 isn't it? All/most of the land NAMA bought was owned locally, rather than developing it they sold it off for a one off cash hit to multinational investors as the price went back up, because we must not do anything ourselves, the market is God. Yes NAMA made a "profit" but we lost the land, probably forever.Here's one that may not go down well ...
Have no time for landlords poor mouthing but in the absence of a revolution the nation is better off with people from here owning one, or a number of rental properties than a situation where Canadian hedge funds and Aussie banks own massive portfolios of housing stock here to the point where they're in a position to manipulate the prices in the market.
I've literally said I've no quotes from himself.I will try find some though at some point if I can be arsed. In my experience of music reviews when a lot of the reviewers use the same words it's usually lifted from a press release so I'm sticking with my presumption it's in a press release.
Emojis used to show I'm not entirely dedicated to this idea.
yesyeah, setting it during the civil war was no accident. whether it's meant to serve as a backdrop or an allegory is another matter.
i haven't seen the movie, but does the fact that it's set in the civil war have any bearing on the plot? i.e. could it have been set ten years earlier without affecting the movie?
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads... If we had any... Which we don't right now.
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.