I always interpreted that as them only abusing TUEs.one of the things I was always fascinated by was Froome's insistence he would never be done for doping. I always interpreted as meaning that he was doing it, but in such as way as to carefully hide his tracks.
Its a toss of a coin as to I'd rather see busted between Wiggins and Froome. I think I'd rather see Wiggins go down. Arrogant cunt.
he was doped off his nut when he was with garmin. He might have cooled the jets a it after winning the tour, but he was deffo on the gear before that.Yeah I think the one thing you can say for Wiggins is that after his one year it seems like he wanted to go off the drugs. Still fuck him though.
they were about to cut Froome loose that time. If you remember the sequence of events in that Vuelta (2011). Froome wasn't orginally on the team. His contract was just about to expire with no sign of them renewing. Then someone gets sick or injured on Sky and they need a last-minute replacement. They sent for Froomey, cos its getting late in the year and the big guns are either focusing on late season classics, or have finished for the season.I always interpreted that as them only abusing TUEs.
Wiggins is the less pleasant seeming of the two, by a fair amount, but I think he didn't believe the clean Sky bullshit, whereas Froome seems more convinced in this and he just coincidentally happened to become a good rider the moment they hockeyed a rake of corticosteroids and T into him.
The thing was, I don't think Sky would have been arsed investing in juice for a donkey like Froome.
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads... If we had any... Which we don't right now.Upgrade now