Good result for Arsenal I'd have thought
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good result for Arsenal I'd have thought
The problem is that he's fucking shit.I think maybe the problem City have is that Demichelis doesn't seem to be a top top top top top top top player
No, he's fucking shit.He's just a top player, instead of being a top top top top top top top top top top top top
Garcia and Milner are injured apparently.... though not sure Milner is really up to Fernandinho's level. But also not sure that Demichelis is the only difference last night. Silva was the only really creative dribbler they had. Other times they'd have Nasri and Aguero there and might have found more space.
I think the thing was also that Mourinho listed players similar to the Arsenal bus-parking game in December, playing Luiz, Ramires and Matic. To me that looked like it was going to be a tight 4-3-3, Chelski playing for a 0-0 or 0-1, so Pelligrini didn't think about changing City's shape. But Chelsea actually played more like they do with the 4-2-3-1 (at least until the end). Ramires and Matic both nearly scored and Ramires was constantly getting into the box. It was more like they played against Liverpool than against Arsenal. In that light maybe City should have put something more in midfield. 20/20 hindsight innit. Great match anyway.
I wanted city to win that. But then I though, choosing between CIty and Chelsea is like preferring AIDS to liver cancer.
What's your problem with Charlie. Grand fella. Bit of a limp.I feel the same when I watch Manchester United play Sunderland.
Fuck Charlie Chawke.
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.