I can only think is a bad move for Tower.
Might be wrong but I think the landlord actually part owns Tower too, so they've prob not being paying the maximum rent that premises is capable of generating.
I'd say they're trying to get in a tenant to pay far higher rent, and keep Tower alive by moving it to another premises.
But losing that footfall...
Hope I'm wrong
Might be wrong but I think the landlord actually part owns Tower too, so they've prob not being paying the maximum rent that premises is capable of generating.
I'd say they're trying to get in a tenant to pay far higher rent, and keep Tower alive by moving it to another premises.
But losing that footfall...
Hope I'm wrong