Robbie Keane says yes. that's good enough for me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pat rabbitte thinkwho are the no crowd then, apart from jim corr?
I was going to ask Jim to put a word in for me with Andrea but she's getting married to some rich slap head.
Pat rabbitte think
Joe Higgins more like ...
Anyway, it's clear from this thread, that the decision on the way to vote should in no way be informed by the actual issues, but rather by an assessment of the personalities of those advocating a vote one way or the other.
yes. Seeing as most people haven't a clue what its actually about (because no one bothers explaining - and no, I'm not going to read the treaty), thats probably fair enough. And is the intention by the respective campaigns.
who thinks that? did no-one tell them there's been a bit of an oul global downturn?The fact that so many people think the current economic situation, in Ireland, is as a direct result of the No to Lisbon result, makes me think it will pass this time.
I heard Hans-Gert Pöttering on the radio last summer, explaining the Lisbon Treaty, he did it without all of the emotive bollocks that accompanied the campaigns on both sides of the debate. If we could get someone like him involved it would mean people would make more informed decisions, whether they voted yes, or no at least they'd know why!
is the treaty not a legal document which would not make sense to the layman? there's plenty of other writings on it for people to inform themselves. that excuse is pretty iffy
Thankfully nobody I know, but while eavesdropping on buses and in pubs and the like I've heard people saying they're voting yes this time because "Isn't that what killed the Celtic Tiger after the last one?"who thinks that? did no-one tell them there's been a bit of an oul global downturn?
For the majority of people the Lisbon Treaty is an inaccessible document, due to language etc. EU policy and politics and EU Law are both incredibly dull subjects at the best of times. I had to read the Lisbon Treaty in college, but then I'd probably have read it anyway, but most people won't take the time to do it, it's much easier for them to have someone else explain it.why cant people just read up on this stuff if "i dont understand" is the stumbling block?
For the majority of people the Lisbon Treaty is an inaccessible document, due to language etc. EU policy and politics and EU Law are both incredibly dull subjects at the best of times. I had to read the Lisbon Treaty in college, but then I'd probably have read it anyway, but most people won't take the time to do it, it's much easier for them to have someone else explain it.
I voted yes on Maastricht 1 and no the second time around on the basis that I was annoyed that the first vote was ignored.
Even if I had voted yes to Lisbon 1 (which I didn't) I'd be voting no now for the same reason I voted no to Maastricht 2.
Upgrade your account now to disable all ads...
Upgrade nowWe use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.